Literature DB >> 1993744

Quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae by using the E-test.

J H Jorgensen1, A W Howell, L A Maher.   

Abstract

The E-test (PDM Epsilometer; AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) is an antimicrobial agent gradient-coated plastic test strip which allows MIC determinations on agar media. The test is performed in a manner similar to the agar disk diffusion procedure. A collection of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae strains possessing various resistance mechanisms was used to evaluate the E-test method. H. influenzae strains were tested with both Haemophilus test medium (HTM) and PDM ASM II chocolate agar, while the S. pneumoniae strains were tested on Mueller-Hinton sheep blood agar. E-test MICs for a total of 10 antimicrobial agents were compared with broth microdilution MICs determined according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards methods. In general, E-test MICs for both species were quickly and easily interpreted and agreed within one log2 MIC increment in 89.8% of tests with H. influenzae and in 80.4% of pneumococcal tests. The majority of disagreements between the E-test and conventional MICs occurred with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole because of trailing and diffuse E-test MIC endpoints with both species. Ampicillin MICs for beta-lactamase-producing H. influenzae determined by the E-test differed at times from those determined by conventional testing because of the vagaries of interpreting colonies growing within the E-test inhibition ellipses. E-test penicillin MICs for pneumococci tended to be 1 to 2 log2 dilutions lower than those determined by using Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with lysed horse blood. Nevertheless, strains of both species with documented resistance to the study drugs were detected by E-tests, i.e., 0.7% of the tests had very major errors with H. influenzae and 0.8% had very major errors with S. pneumoniae. Thus, the E-test represents a potential alternative method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of these two fastidious bacterial species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1993744      PMCID: PMC269713          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.29.1.109-114.1991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  10 in total

1.  Use of Haemophilus test medium for broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; L A Maher; A W Howell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae, Branhamella catarrhalis, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  G V Doern; R N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Antibiotic resistance and serotypes of 100 Streptococcus pneumoniae strains isolated in a children's hospital in Barcelona, Spain.

Authors:  C Latorre; T Juncosa; I Sanfeliu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Pneumococcal resistance to antibiotics.

Authors:  K P Klugman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Relationship between in vitro susceptibility test results for chloramphenicol and production of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase by Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Aerococcus species.

Authors:  H W Matthews; C N Baker; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Distribution and resistance patterns of Haemophilus influenzae: a European cooperative study.

Authors:  K Machka; I Braveny; H Dabernat; K Dornbusch; E Van Dyck; F H Kayser; B Van Klingeren; H Mittermayer; E Perea; M Powell
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Improved medium for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; J S Redding; L A Maher; A W Howell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Characterization of non-beta-lactamase-mediated ampicillin resistance in Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  P M Mendelman; D O Chaffin; T L Stull; C E Rubens; K D Mack; A L Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  National collaborative study of the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  G V Doern; J H Jorgensen; C Thornsberry; D A Preston; T Tubert; J S Redding; L A Maher
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Disk diffusion susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae using haemophilus test medium.

Authors:  G V Doern; J H Jorgensen; C Thornsberry; H Snapper
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.267

  10 in total
  38 in total

1.  Determination of penicillin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae and use of co-trimoxazole in treatment of pneumococcal pneumoniae.

Authors:  M K Lalitha; A Manoharan; R Pai; K Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Identification of beta-lactamase-negative, ampicillin-resistant strains of Haemophilus influenzae with four methods and eight media.

Authors:  A L Barry; P C Fuchs; S D Brown
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Diversity of ampicillin resistance genes and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Haemophilus influenzae strains isolated in Korea.

Authors:  In-Suk Kim; Chang-Seok Ki; Sunjoo Kim; Won Sup Oh; Kyong Ran Peck; Jae-Hoon Song; Kyungwon Lee; Nam Yong Lee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Can the Etest correctly determine the MICs of beta-lactam and cephalosporin antibiotics for beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae?

Authors:  Dewan Sakhawat Billal; Muneki Hotomi; Noboru Yamanaka
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Comparison of the E test and microdilution for detection of beta-lactam-resistant mutants that are stably derepressed for type I beta-lactamase.

Authors:  C C Knapp; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of the E test and a reference agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  J Wüst; U Hardegger
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Antimicrobial resistance and serotype distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains causing childhood infections in Bangladesh, 1993 to 1997.

Authors:  S K Saha; N Rikitomi; M Ruhulamin; H Masaki; M Hanif; M Islam; K Watanabe; K Ahmed; K Matsumoto; R B Sack; T Nagatake
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of E-test with broth microdilution and disk diffusion for susceptibility testing of coryneform bacteria.

Authors:  L Martínez-Martínez; M C Ortega; A I Suárez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  E test as susceptibility test and epidemiologic tool for evaluation of Neisseria meningitidis isolates.

Authors:  J H Hughes; D J Biedenbach; M E Erwin; R N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of antibiotic resistance and serotype composition of carriage and invasive pneumococci among Bangladeshi children: implications for treatment policy and vaccine formulation.

Authors:  Samir K Saha; Abdullah H Baqui; Gary L Darmstadt; M Ruhulamin; Mohammed Hanif; Shams El Arifeen; Mathuram Santosham; Kazunori Oishi; Tsuyoshi Nagatake; Robert E Black
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.