Literature DB >> 1291316

Comparison of the E test and a reference agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

J Wüst1, U Hardegger.   

Abstract

The susceptibility of 146 recent clinical isolates of gram-negative and gram-positive anaerobes was determined by the E test (AB Biodisk) on both Wilkins-Chalgren and PDM ASM II (AB Biodisk) agar. Results of the E test were compared with results obtained by the NCCLS agar dilution method using Wilkins-Chalgren agar. Incubation was for 20 hours and 44 hours in the E test and for 44 hours in the NCCLS method. In general, 44 hour results were more reliable; however, NCCLS readings were made only once after 44 hours. After two days of incubation, 91% of E test results on Wilkins-Chalgren agar were within one dilution and 98% within two dilutions of the corresponding NCCLS values; on PDM agar these values were 89% and 98%, respectively. Major and very major discrepancies combined were less than 1%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1291316     DOI: 10.1007/bf01961139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the E Test to agar dilution, broth microdilution, and agar diffusion susceptibility testing techniques by using a special challenge set of bacteria.

Authors:  C N Baker; S A Stocker; D H Culver; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria: myth, magic, or method?

Authors:  H M Wexler
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Comparison of the E test (PDM epsilometer) and broth microdilution susceptibility tests for members of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

Authors:  P R Murray; A C Niles
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  D M Citron; M I Ostovari; A Karlsson; E J Goldstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Antibiotic- and method-dependent variation in susceptibility testing results of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; C V Sanders
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Mechanisms of resistance in anaerobes and new developments in testing.

Authors:  S M Finegold
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 7.  [The sensitivity of anaerobic bacteria to chemotherapeutic agents (Zurich, 1991)].

Authors:  J Wüst; U Hardegger
Journal:  Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax       Date:  1991-12-27

8.  Quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae by using the E-test.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; A W Howell; L A Maher
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Antimicrobial susceptibilities and serogroups of clinical strains of Clostridium difficile isolated in France in 1991 and 1997.

Authors:  F Barbut; D Decré; B Burghoffer; D Lesage; F Delisle; V Lalande; M Delmée; V Avesani; N Sano; C Coudert; J C Petit
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Susceptibilities of 201 anaerobes to erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and roxithromycin by oxyrase agar dilution and E test methodologies.

Authors:  S K Spangler; M R Jacobs; P C Appelbaum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Septicemia in neutropenic patients infected with Clostridium tertium resistant to cefepime and other expanded-spectrum cephalosporins.

Authors:  S Steyaert; R Peleman; M Vaneechoutte; T De Baere; G Claeys; G Verschraegen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of E-Test for determination of antimicrobial MICs for Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients.

Authors:  E F Marley; C Mohla; J M Campos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Propionibacterium acnes as a cause of aggressive aortic valve endocarditis and importance of tissue grinding: case report and review.

Authors:  H Günthard; A Hany; M Turina; J Wüst
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Severe infections caused by Propionibacterium acnes: an underestimated pathogen in late postoperative infections.

Authors:  E Jakab; R Zbinden; J Gubler; C Ruef; A von Graevenitz; M Krause
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec

7.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Enteric Gram Negative Facultative Anaerobe Bacilli in Aerobic versus Anaerobic Conditions.

Authors:  Zachary DeMars; Silpak Biswas; Raghavendra G Amachawadi; David G Renter; Victoriya V Volkova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.