Literature DB >> 3481247

Disk diffusion susceptibility testing of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

R Horn1, A M Bourgault, F Lamothe.   

Abstract

The susceptibilities of 225 isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group to six antibiotics were determined by a new disk diffusion test in Wilkins-Chalgren agar and by the standard agar dilution method. For disk diffusion, the bacteria were directly suspended in saline and immediately swabbed onto 15-cm agar plates. Disks of cefoxitin (30 micrograms), chloramphenicol (30 micrograms), clindamycin (2 micrograms), moxalactam (30 micrograms), imipenem (10 micrograms), and ticarcillin (75 micrograms) were applied, and the plates were incubated at 37 degrees C in an anaerobic atmosphere. Zone sizes were measured at 24 h. The results of disk diffusion and agar dilution were compared by regression analysis by the method of least squares and by the error rate-bounded method. Zones were easily measured for 216 strains (96%). The correlation between the MICs and diameters of inhibition for cefoxitin, clindamycin, moxalactam, and ticarcillin was generally good. A correlation could not be established for chloramphenicol and imipenem, as there were too few resistant strains. With the recommended resistance breakpoints, the following susceptible and resistant zone diameter breakpoints could be established: cefoxitin, less than or equal to 19 and greater than or equal to 21 mm; clindamycin, less than or equal to 14 and greater than or equal to 18 mm; moxalactam, less than or equal to 21 and greater than or equal to 25 mm; and ticarcillin, less than or equal to 15 and greater than or equal to 16 mm. By applying these zone criteria, the percentage of false-susceptible strains was less than 1% and of false-resistant strains was less than 4% for the drugs tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3481247      PMCID: PMC174997          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.31.10.1596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  11 in total

1.  Medium for use in antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  T D Wilkins; S Chalgren
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Evaluation of four disk diffusion methods for antimicrobic susceptibility tests with anaerobic gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  A L Barry; G D Fay
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Susceptibility tests of anaerobic bacteria: statistical and clinical considerations.

Authors:  C M Metzler; R M DeHaan
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis to six antibiotics determined by standardized antimicrobial disc susceptibility testing.

Authors:  V L Sutter; Y Kwok; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Modified broth-disk method for testing the antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  T D Wilkins; T Thiel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Recent experience with antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria: increasing resistance to penicillin.

Authors:  R S Edson; J E Rosenblatt; D T Lee; E A McVey
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Survey of anaerobic susceptibility patterns in Canada.

Authors:  A M Bourgault; G K Harding; J A Smith; G B Horsman; T J Marrie; F Lamothe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Standardized antimicrobial disc susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. I. Susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis to tetracycline.

Authors:  V L Sutter; Y Y Kwok; S M Finegold
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-02

9.  Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria from several French hospitals to three major antibiotics.

Authors:  L Dubreuil; J Devos; C Neut; C Romond
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Nationwide study of the susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States.

Authors:  F P Tally; G J Cuchural; N V Jacobus; S L Gorbach; K Aldridge; T Cleary; S M Finegold; G Hill; P Iannini; J P O'Keefe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria: myth, magic, or method?

Authors:  H M Wexler
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Review of methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobes.

Authors:  R J Zabransky
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  D M Citron; M I Ostovari; A Karlsson; E J Goldstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Antimicrobial prophylaxis for major head and neck surgery in cancer patients: sulbactam-ampicillin versus clindamycin-amikacin.

Authors:  M Phan; P Van der Auwera; G Andry; M Aoun; G Chantrain; R Deraemaecker; P Dor; D Daneau; P Ewalenko; F Meunier
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.191

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.