Literature DB >> 19382204

Automated site preparation in physics-based rescoring of receptor ligand complexes.

Chaya S Rapp1, Cheryl Schonbrun, Matthew P Jacobson, Chakrapani Kalyanaraman, Niu Huang.   

Abstract

Hydrogen atoms are not typically observable in X-ray crystal structures, but inferring their locations is often important in structure-based drug design. In addition, protonation states of the protein can change in response to ligand binding, as can the orientations of OH groups, a subtle form of "induced fit." We implement and evaluate an automated procedure for optimizing polar hydrogens in protein-binding sites in complex with ligands. Specifically, we apply the previously described Independent Cluster Decomposition Algorithm (ICDA) algorithm (Li et al., Proteins 2007;66:824-837), which assigns the ionization states of titratable residues, the amide orientations of Asn/Gln side chains, the imidazole ring orientation in His, and the orientations of OH/SH groups, in a unified algorithm. We test the utility of this method for identifying nativelike ligand poses using 247 protein-ligand complexes from an established database of docked decoys. Pose selection is performed with a physics-based scoring function based on a molecular mechanics energy function and a Generalized Born implicit solvent model. The use of the ICDA receptor preparation protocol, implemented with no knowledge of the native ligand pose, increases the accuracy of pose selection significantly, with the average RMSD over all complexes decreasing from 2.7 to 1.5 A when applying ICDA. Large improvements are seen for specific classes of binding sites with titratable groups, such as aspartyl proteases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19382204      PMCID: PMC2744578          DOI: 10.1002/prot.22415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  72 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Philippe Ferrara; Holger Gohlke; Daniel J Price; Gerhard Klebe; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; David L Pincus; Chaya S Rapp; Tyler J F Day; Barry Honig; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

4.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  The use of consensus scoring in ligand-based virtual screening.

Authors:  J Christian Baber; William A Shirley; Yinghong Gao; Miklos Feher
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing.

Authors:  Alan P Graves; Devleena M Shivakumar; Sarah E Boyce; Matthew P Jacobson; David A Case; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Discovery of kinase inhibitors by high-throughput docking and scoring based on a transferable linear interaction energy model.

Authors:  Peter Kolb; Danzhi Huang; Fabian Dey; Amedeo Caflisch
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  A fast estimate of electrostatic group contributions to the free energy of protein-inhibitor binding.

Authors:  I Muegge; H Tao; A Warshel
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1997-12

10.  Receptor-specific scoring functions derived from quantum chemical models improve affinity estimates for in-silico drug discovery.

Authors:  Bernhard Fischer; Kaori Fukuzawa; Wolfgang Wenzel
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  Biased retrieval of chemical series in receptor-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Natasja Brooijmans; Jason B Cross; Christine Humblet
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Protonation and pK changes in protein-ligand binding.

Authors:  Alexey V Onufriev; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.318

3.  A molecular mechanics approach to modeling protein-ligand interactions: relative binding affinities in congeneric series.

Authors:  Chaya Rapp; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; Aviva Schiffmiller; Esther Leah Schoenbrun; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Life beyond kinases: structure-based discovery of sorafenib as nanomolar antagonist of 5-HT receptors.

Authors:  Xingyu Lin; Xi-Ping Huang; Gang Chen; Ryan Whaley; Shiming Peng; Yanli Wang; Guoliang Zhang; Simon X Wang; Shaohui Wang; Bryan L Roth; Niu Huang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  The Discovery of Potent SHP2 Inhibitors with Anti-Proliferative Activity in Breast Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Rose Ghemrawi; Mostafa Khair; Shaima Hasan; Raghad Aldulaymi; Shaikha S AlNeyadi; Noor Atatreh; Mohammad A Ghattas
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 6.  The role of protonation states in ligand-receptor recognition and binding.

Authors:  Marharyta Petukh; Shannon Stefl; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 7.  Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: a problem-centric review.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Qingliang Li; Zhigang Zhou; Yanli Wang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Active site detection by spatial conformity and electrostatic analysis--unravelling a proteolytic function in shrimp alkaline phosphatase.

Authors:  Sandeep Chakraborty; Renu Minda; Lipika Salaye; Swapan K Bhattacharjee; Basuthkar J Rao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  On the energy components governing molecular recognition in the framework of continuum approaches.

Authors:  Lin Li; Lin Wang; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2015-03-06

Review 10.  Computational methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Sumudu P Leelananda; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.883

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.