Literature DB >> 23170880

The role of protonation states in ligand-receptor recognition and binding.

Marharyta Petukh1, Shannon Stefl, Emil Alexov.   

Abstract

In this review we discuss the role of protonation states in receptor-ligand interactions, providing experimental evidences and computational predictions that complex formation may involve titratable groups with unusual pKa's and that protonation states frequently change from unbound to bound states. These protonation changes result in proton uptake/release, which in turn causes the pH-dependence of the binding. Indeed, experimental data strongly suggest that almost any binding is pH-dependent and to be correctly modeled, the protonation states must be properly assigned prior to and after the binding. One may accurately predict the protonation states when provided with the structures of the unbound proteins and their complex; however, the modeling becomes much more complicated if the bound state has to be predicted in a docking protocol or if the structures of either bound or unbound receptor-ligand are not available. The major challenges that arise in these situations are the coupling between binding and protonation states, and the conformational changes induced by the binding and ionization states of titratable groups. In addition, any assessment of the protonation state, either before or after binding, must refer to the pH of binding, which is frequently unknown. Thus, even if the pKa's of ionizable groups can be correctly assigned for both unbound and bound state, without knowing the experimental pH one cannot assign the corresponding protonation states, and consequently one cannot calculate the resulting proton uptake/release. It is pointed out, that while experimental pH may not be the physiological pH and binding may involve proton uptake/release, there is a tendency that the native receptor-ligand complexes have evolved toward specific either subcellular or tissue characteristic pH at which the proton uptake/release is either minimal or absent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23170880      PMCID: PMC3625499          DOI: 10.2174/1381612811319230004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Pharm Des        ISSN: 1381-6128            Impact factor:   3.116


  101 in total

1.  Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Irene M A Nooren; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Completely buried, non-ion-paired glutamic acid contributes favorably to the conformational stability of pyrrolidone carboxyl peptidases from hyperthermophiles.

Authors:  Jai K Kaushik; Satoshi Iimura; Kyoko Ogasahara; Yuriko Yamagata; Shin-ichi Segawa; Katsuhide Yutani
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 3.  Principles of protein-protein interactions: what are the preferred ways for proteins to interact?

Authors:  Ozlem Keskin; Attila Gursoy; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 4.  Evaluation of the performance of 3D virtual screening protocols: RMSD comparisons, enrichment assessments, and decoy selection--what can we learn from earlier mistakes?

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Patrick Markt; Simona Distinto; Gerhard Wolber; Thierry Langer
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins.

Authors:  J Janin; S Miller; C Chothia
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1988-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  pH-dependence of the specific binding of Cu(II) and Zn(II) ions to the amyloid-β peptide.

Authors:  Leila Ghalebani; Anna Wahlström; Jens Danielsson; Sebastian K T S Wärmländer; Astrid Gräslund
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Dependence of substrate binding and catalysis on pH, ionic strength, and temperature for thymine DNA glycosylase: Insights into recognition and processing of G·T mispairs.

Authors:  Atanu Maiti; Alexander C Drohat
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-04-06

8.  pH dependence and stoichiometry of binding to the Fc region of IgG by the herpes simplex virus Fc receptor gE-gI.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Sprague; W Lance Martin; Pamela J Bjorkman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-01-20       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Calculations of pH-dependent binding of proteins to biological membranes.

Authors:  Maja Mihajlovic; Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Design and Evaluation of Ethyl Cellulose Based Matrix Tablets of Ibuprofen with pH Modulated Release Kinetics.

Authors:  S Chandran; Laila F A Asghar; Neelima Mantha
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.975

View more
  22 in total

1.  Ultrafast protein structure-based virtual screening with Panther.

Authors:  Sanna P Niinivehmas; Kari Salokas; Sakari Lätti; Hannu Raunio; Olli T Pentikäinen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Receptor-ligand molecular docking.

Authors:  Isabella A Guedes; Camila S de Magalhães; Laurent E Dardenne
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2013-12-21

3.  Homology modeling, substrate docking, and molecular simulation studies of mycobacteriophage Che12 lysin A.

Authors:  Shainaba A Saadhali; Sameer Hassan; Luke Elizabeth Hanna; Uma Devi Ranganathan; Vanaja Kumar
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 4.  Cysteine Oxidation in Proteins: Structure, Biophysics, and Simulation.

Authors:  Diego Garrido Ruiz; Angelica Sandoval-Perez; Amith Vikram Rangarajan; Emma L Gunderson; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.321

5.  Acid-Base Equilibrium and Self-Association in Relation to High Antitumor Activity of Selected Unsymmetrical Bisacridines Established by Extensive Chemometric Analysis.

Authors:  Michał Kosno; Tomasz Laskowski; Joanna E Frackowiak; Agnieszka Potęga; Agnieszka Kurdyn; Witold Andrałojć; Julia Borzyszkowska-Bukowska; Katarzyna Szwarc-Karabyka; Zofia Mazerska
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 6.  Molecular mechanisms of disease-causing missense mutations.

Authors:  Shannon Stefl; Hafumi Nishi; Marharyta Petukh; Anna R Panchenko; Emil Alexov
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Characterization of the APLF FHA-XRCC1 phosphopeptide interaction and its structural and functional implications.

Authors:  Kyungmin Kim; Lars C Pedersen; Thomas W Kirby; Eugene F DeRose; Robert E London
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  On the energy components governing molecular recognition in the framework of continuum approaches.

Authors:  Lin Li; Lin Wang; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2015-03-06

9.  Chronic Beryllium Disease: revealing the role of beryllium ion and small peptides binding to HLA-DP2.

Authors:  Marharyta Petukh; Bohua Wu; Shannon Stefl; Nick Smith; David Hyde-Volpe; Li Wang; Emil Alexov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Computational Tools for Interpreting Ion Channel pH-Dependence.

Authors:  Ivan Sazanavets; Jim Warwicker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.