Literature DB >> 16426063

The use of consensus scoring in ligand-based virtual screening.

J Christian Baber1, William A Shirley, Yinghong Gao, Miklos Feher.   

Abstract

A new consensus approach has been developed for ligand-based virtual screening. It involves combining highly disparate properties in order to improve performance in virtual screening. The properties include structural, 2D pharmacophore and property-based fingerprints, scores derived using BCUT descriptors, and 3D pharmacophore approaches. Different approaches for the combination of all or some of these methods have been tested. Logistic regression and sum ranks were found to be the most advantageous in different pharmaceutical applications. The three major reasons consensus scoring appears to enrich data sets better than single scoring functions are (1) using multiple scoring functions is similar to repeated samplings, in which case the mean is closer to the true value than any single value, (2) due to the better clustering of actives, multiple sampling will recover more actives than inactives, and (3) different methods seem to agree more on the ranking of the actives than on the inactives. Furthermore, consensus results are not only better but are also more consistent across receptor systems.

Year:  2006        PMID: 16426063     DOI: 10.1021/ci050296y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  15 in total

1.  AB-Bind: Antibody binding mutational database for computational affinity predictions.

Authors:  Sarah Sirin; James R Apgar; Eric M Bennett; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Drug search for leishmaniasis: a virtual screening approach by grid computing.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ochoa; Stanley J Watowich; Andrés Flórez; Carol V Mesa; Sara M Robledo; Carlos Muskus
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Reverse fingerprinting, similarity searching by group fusion and fingerprint bit importance.

Authors:  Chris Williams
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 2.943

4.  Automated site preparation in physics-based rescoring of receptor ligand complexes.

Authors:  Chaya S Rapp; Cheryl Schonbrun; Matthew P Jacobson; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; Niu Huang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-10

Review 5.  Ubiquitination Regulators Discovered by Virtual Screening for the Treatment of Cancer.

Authors:  Ying-Qi Song; Chun Wu; Ke-Jia Wu; Quan-Bin Han; Xiang-Min Miao; Dik-Lung Ma; Chung-Hang Leung
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-12

6.  CSAR benchmark exercise of 2010: combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Peter Man-Un Ung; Emilio X Esposito; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Identification of novel antimalarial chemotypes via chemoinformatic compound selection methods for a high-throughput screening program against the novel malarial target, PfNDH2: increasing hit rate via virtual screening methods.

Authors:  Raman Sharma; Alexandre S Lawrenson; Nicholas E Fisher; Ashley J Warman; Alison E Shone; Alasdair Hill; Alison Mbekeani; Chandrakala Pidathala; Richard K Amewu; Suet Leung; Peter Gibbons; David W Hong; Paul Stocks; Gemma L Nixon; James Chadwick; Joanne Shearer; Ian Gowers; David Cronk; Serge P Parel; Paul M O'Neill; Stephen A Ward; Giancarlo A Biagini; Neil G Berry
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Scoring functions and enrichment: a case study on Hsp90.

Authors:  Chrysi Konstantinou-Kirtay; John B O Mitchell; James A Lumley
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A novel hybrid ultrafast shape descriptor method for use in virtual screening.

Authors:  Edward O Cannon; Florian Nigsch; John B O Mitchell
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2008-02-18       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Enhanced ranking of PknB Inhibitors using data fusion methods.

Authors:  Abhik Seal; Perumal Yogeeswari; Dharmaranjan Sriram; David J Wild
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.