Literature DB >> 21780805

A molecular mechanics approach to modeling protein-ligand interactions: relative binding affinities in congeneric series.

Chaya Rapp1, Chakrapani Kalyanaraman, Aviva Schiffmiller, Esther Leah Schoenbrun, Matthew P Jacobson.   

Abstract

We introduce the "Prime-ligand" method for ranking ligands in congeneric series. The method employs a single scoring function, the OPLS-AA/GBSA molecular mechanics/implicit solvent model, for all stages of sampling and scoring. We evaluate the method using 12 test sets of congeneric series for which experimental binding data is available in the literature, as well as the structure of one member of the series bound to the protein. Ligands are "docked" by superimposing a common stem fragment among the compounds in the series using a crystal complex from the Protein Data Bank and sampling the conformational space of the variable region. Our results show good correlation between our predicted rankings and the experimental data for cases in which binding affinities differ by at least 1 order of magnitude. For 11 out of 12 cases, >90% of such ligand pairs could be correctly ranked, while for the remaining case, Factor Xa, 76% of such pairs were correctly ranked. A small number of compounds could not be docked using the current protocol because of the large size of functional groups that could not be accommodated by a rigid receptor. CPU requirements for the method, involving CPU minutes per ligand, are modest compared with more rigorous methods that use similar force fields, such as free energy perturbation. We also benchmark the scoring function using series of ligands bound to the same protein within the CSAR data set. We demonstrate that energy minimization of ligands in the crystal structures is critical to obtain any correlation with experimentally determined binding affinities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21780805      PMCID: PMC3183355          DOI: 10.1021/ci200033n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  49 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Philippe Ferrara; Holger Gohlke; Daniel J Price; Gerhard Klebe; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; David L Pincus; Chaya S Rapp; Tyler J F Day; Barry Honig; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

4.  Modeling ligand-receptor interaction for some MHC class II HLA-DR4 peptide mimetic inhibitors using several molecular docking and 3D QSAR techniques.

Authors:  Hsin-Yuan Wei; Keng-Chang Tsai; Thy-Hou Lin
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Physics-based scoring of protein-ligand complexes: enrichment of known inhibitors in large-scale virtual screening.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; John J Irwin; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing.

Authors:  Alan P Graves; Devleena M Shivakumar; Sarah E Boyce; Matthew P Jacobson; David A Case; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Role of the active-site solvent in the thermodynamics of factor Xa ligand binding.

Authors:  Robert Abel; Tom Young; Ramy Farid; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Predicting binding modes from free energy calculations.

Authors:  Martin Nervall; Peter Hanspers; Jens Carlsson; Lars Boukharta; Johan Aqvist
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Evaluation of docking/scoring approaches: a comparative study based on MMP3 inhibitors.

Authors:  S Ha; R Andreani; A Robbins; I Muegge
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  12 in total

1.  Comprehensive evaluation of end-point free energy techniques in carboxylated-pillar[6]arene host-guest binding: I. Standard procedure.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; Lei Zheng; Chu Qin; John Z H Zhang; Zhaoxi Sun
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 4.179

2.  A cysteine protease inhibitor rescues mice from a lethal Cryptosporidium parvum infection.

Authors:  Momar Ndao; Milli Nath-Chowdhury; Mohammed Sajid; Victoria Marcus; Susan T Mashiyama; Judy Sakanari; Eric Chow; Zachary Mackey; Kirkwood M Land; Matthew P Jacobson; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; James H McKerrow; Michael J Arrowood; Conor R Caffrey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding affinities from extensive alchemical and end-point free energy calculations.

Authors:  Zhe Huai; Huaiyu Yang; Xiao Li; Zhaoxi Sun
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding poses and binding affinities from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.

Authors:  Zhaoxi Sun
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Binding thermodynamics and interaction patterns of human purine nucleoside phosphorylase-inhibitor complexes from extensive free energy calculations.

Authors:  Zhe Huai; Huaiyu Yang; Zhaoxi Sun
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Energetic differences between non-domain-swapped and domain-swapped chain connectivities in the K2P potassium channel TRAAK.

Authors:  Carlos Navarro-Retamal; Julio Caballero
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.361

7.  Evolution of enzymatic activities in the enolase superfamily: galactarate dehydratase III from Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58.

Authors:  Fiona P Groninger-Poe; Jason T Bouvier; Matthew W Vetting; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; Ritesh Kumar; Steven C Almo; Matthew P Jacobson; John A Gerlt
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Predicting resistance of clinical Abl mutations to targeted kinase inhibitors using alchemical free-energy calculations.

Authors:  Kevin Hauser; Christopher Negron; Steven K Albanese; Soumya Ray; Thomas Steinbrecher; Robert Abel; John D Chodera; Lingle Wang
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-06-13

9.  Binding mode analyses and pharmacophore model development for stilbene derivatives as a novel and competitive class of α-glucosidase inhibitors.

Authors:  Yuno Lee; Songmi Kim; Jun Young Kim; Mahreen Arooj; Siu Kim; Swan Hwang; Byeong-Woo Kim; Ki Hun Park; Keun Woo Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Computational Macrocyclization: From de novo Macrocycle Generation to Binding Affinity Estimation.

Authors:  Vincent Wagner; Linda Jantz; Hans Briem; Kai Sommer; Matthias Rarey; Clara D Christ
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.