Literature DB >> 17876816

Receptor-specific scoring functions derived from quantum chemical models improve affinity estimates for in-silico drug discovery.

Bernhard Fischer1, Kaori Fukuzawa, Wolfgang Wenzel.   

Abstract

The adaptation of forcefield-based scoring function to specific receptors remains an important challenge for in-silico drug discovery. Here we compare binding energies of forcefield-based scoring functions with models that are reparameterized on the basis of large-scale quantum calculations of the receptor. We compute binding energies of eleven ligands to the human estrogen receptor subtype alpha (ERalpha) and four ligands to the human retinoic acid receptor of isotype gamma (RARgamma). Using the FlexScreen all-atom receptor-ligand docking approach, we compare docking simulations parameterized by quantum-mechanical calculation of a large protein fragment with purely forcefield-based models. The use of receptor flexibility in the FlexScreen permits the treatment of all ligands in the same receptor model. We find a high correlation between the classical binding energy obtained in the docking simulation and quantum mechanical binding energies and a good correlation with experimental affinities R=0.81 for ERalpha and R=0.95 for RARgamma using the quantum derived scoring functions. A significant part of this improvement is retained, when only the receptor is treated with quantum-based parameters, while the ligands are parameterized with a purely classical model. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17876816     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  7 in total

1.  Density functional tight binding: values of semi-empirical methods in an ab initio era.

Authors:  Qiang Cui; Marcus Elstner
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.676

2.  Molecular simulation of protein-surface interactions: benefits, problems, solutions, and future directions.

Authors:  Robert A Latour
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.456

3.  Automated site preparation in physics-based rescoring of receptor ligand complexes.

Authors:  Chaya S Rapp; Cheryl Schonbrun; Matthew P Jacobson; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; Niu Huang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-10

Review 4.  Advances in Applying Computer-Aided Drug Design for Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Mootaz M Salman; Zaid Al-Obaidi; Philip Kitchen; Andrea Loreto; Roslyn M Bill; Richard Wade-Martins
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  MoDock: A multi-objective strategy improves the accuracy for molecular docking.

Authors:  Junfeng Gu; Xu Yang; Ling Kang; Jinying Wu; Xicheng Wang
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.405

Review 6.  Computational methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Sumudu P Leelananda; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.883

Review 7.  Quantum mechanics implementation in drug-design workflows: does it really help?

Authors:  Olayide A Arodola; Mahmoud Es Soliman
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.162

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.