Literature DB >> 11468764

Administrative and artificial censoring in censored regression models.

M M Joffe1.   

Abstract

Administrative censoring, in which potential censoring times are known even for subjects who fail, is common in clinical and epidemiologic studies. Nonetheless, most statistical methods for failure-time data do not use the information contained in these potential censoring times. Robins has proposed two approaches for using this information to estimate parameters in an accelerated failure-time model; the methods generally require the analyst to treat as censored some subjects whose failure time is observed. This paper provides a rationale for this "artificial censoring", discusses some of its consequences, and illustrates some of these points with data from a randomized trial of breast cancer screening. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11468764     DOI: 10.1002/sim.850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  13 in total

1.  Incorporating follow-up time in M-estimation for survival data.

Authors:  Glenn Heller
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Extended instrumental variables estimation for overall effects.

Authors:  Marshall M Joffe; Dylan Small; Thomas Ten Have; Steve Brunelli; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Semiparametric transformation models for causal inference in time to event studies with all-or-nothing compliance.

Authors:  Wen Yu; Kani Chen; Michael E Sobel; Zhiliang Ying
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 4.488

4.  Empirical efficiency maximization: improved locally efficient covariate adjustment in randomized experiments and survival analysis.

Authors:  Daniel B Rubin; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Limitation of inverse probability-of-censoring weights in estimating survival in the presence of strong selection bias.

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe; Stephen R Cole; Joan S Chmiel; Alvaro Muñoz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Estimating absolute risks in the presence of nonadherence: an application to a follow-up study with baseline randomization.

Authors:  Sengwee Toh; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Roger Logan; James M Robins; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  SMART designs in observational studies of opioid therapy duration.

Authors:  John W Jackson; Joshua J Gagne
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Instrumental variables estimation of exposure effects on a time-to-event endpoint using structural cumulative survival models.

Authors:  Torben Martinussen; Stijn Vansteelandt; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; David M Zucker
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Estimating the effect of cumulative occupational asbestos exposure on time to lung cancer mortality: using structural nested failure-time models to account for healthy-worker survivor bias.

Authors:  Ashley I Naimi; Stephen R Cole; Michael G Hudgens; David B Richardson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Semiparametric analysis of recurrent events: artificial censoring, truncation, pairwise estimation and inference.

Authors:  Debashis Ghosh
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2010-01-10       Impact factor: 1.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.