Literature DB >> 23843666

Improved double-robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Andrea Rotnitzky1, Quanhong Lei, Mariela Sued, James M Robins.   

Abstract

Recently proposed double-robust estimators for a population mean from incomplete data and for a finite number of counterfactual means can have much higher efficiency than the usual double-robust estimators under misspecification of the outcome model. In this paper, we derive a new class of double-robust estimators for the parameters of regression models with incomplete cross-sectional or longitudinal data, and of marginal structural mean models for cross-sectional data with similar efficiency properties. Unlike the recent proposals, our estimators solve outcome regression estimating equations. In a simulation study, the new estimator shows improvements in variance relative to the standard double-robust estimator that are in agreement with those suggested by asymptotic theory.

Keywords:  Drop-out; Marginal structural model; Missing at random

Year:  2012        PMID: 23843666      PMCID: PMC3635709          DOI: 10.1093/biomet/ass013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrika        ISSN: 0006-3444            Impact factor:   2.445


  6 in total

1.  Comment: improved local efficiency and double robustness.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Tan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part I.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; James M Robins
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Empirical efficiency maximization: improved locally efficient covariate adjustment in randomized experiments and survival analysis.

Authors:  Daniel B Rubin; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.901

6.  Improving efficiency and robustness of the doubly robust estimator for a population mean with incomplete data.

Authors:  Weihua Cao; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 2.445

  6 in total
  27 in total

1.  Leveraging prognostic baseline variables to gain precision in randomized trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth Colantuoni; Michael Rosenblum
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Introduction to Double Robust Methods for Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Shaun R Seaman; Stijn Vansteelandt
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.901

3.  Targeted minimum loss based estimator that outperforms a given estimator.

Authors:  Susan Gruber; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 0.968

4.  Doubly robust estimation and causal inference in longitudinal studies with dropout and truncation by death.

Authors:  Michelle Shardell; Gregory E Hicks; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Doubly Robust Estimation in Observational Studies with Partial Interference.

Authors:  Lan Liu; Michael G Hudgens; Bradley Saul; John D Clemens; Mohammad Ali; Michael E Emch
Journal:  Stat (Int Stat Inst)       Date:  2019-01-10

6.  Patient engagement and study design of PROP UP: A multi-site patient-centered prospective observational study of patients undergoing hepatitis C treatment.

Authors:  Donna M Evon; Carol E Golin; Paul Stewart; Michael W Fried; Shani Alston; Bryce Reeve; Anna S Lok; Richard K Sterling; Joseph K Lim; Nancy Reau; Souvik Sarkar; David R Nelson; K R Reddy; Adrian M Di Bisceglie
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Improved precision in the analysis of randomized trials with survival outcomes, without assuming proportional hazards.

Authors:  Iván Díaz; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Daniel F Hanley; Michael Rosenblum
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Multiple robustness in factorized likelihood models.

Authors:  J Molina; A Rotnitzky; M Sued; J M Robins
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.445

9.  An alternative robust estimator of average treatment effect in causal inference.

Authors:  Jianxuan Liu; Yanyuan Ma; Lan Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Rejoinder to comments on Evaluation of Viable Dynamic Treatment Regimes in a Sequentially Randomized Trial of Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Andrea Rotnitzky; Xihong Lin; Randall E Millikan; Peter F Thall
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.