Literature DB >> 19380894

A landmark blocks searching for a hidden platform in an environment with a distinctive shape after extended pretraining.

Murray R Horne1, John M Pearce.   

Abstract

In the blocking phase of three experiments, rats had to find a submerged platform beneath a spherical landmark in one corner of a triangular pool. Prior to this treatment, they were required to find the platform relative to either a sphere above it (blocking groups) or a rod attached to it (control groups). The position of the platform changed from trial to trial for the initial training. The sphere did not restrict learning about the geometric cues provided by the triangular arena in the blocking phase when 12 sessions of initial training took place in either the triangular (Experiment 1) or a circular (Experiment 3) pool. Blocking was observed, however, after 24 sessions of initial training in either the triangular (Experiment 2) or the circular (Experiment 3) pool. Thus, blocking of geometric cues by a landmark is possible after extended initial training with the blocking cue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19380894     DOI: 10.3758/LB.37.2.167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  16 in total

1.  Influence of a beacon on spatial learning based on the shape of the test environment.

Authors:  J M Pearce; J Ward-Robinson; M Good; C Fussell; A Aydin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2001-10

2.  The effects of pre-exposure on escape from a Morris pool.

Authors:  E S Redhead; J Prados; J M Pearce
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2001-11

3.  Blocking in the Morris swimming pool.

Authors:  A D Roberts; J M Pearce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1999-04

4.  Absence of overshadowing and blocking between landmarks and the geometric cues provided by the shape of a test arena.

Authors:  Andrew Hayward; Anthony McGregor; Mark A Good; John M Pearce
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2003-02

Review 5.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

6.  Learning about environmental geometry: an associative model.

Authors:  Noam Y Miller; Sara J Shettleworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2007-07

7.  Blocking of spatial learning between enclosure geometry and a local landmark.

Authors:  Paul N Wilson; Tim Alexander
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Absence of overshadowing between a landmark and geometric cues in a distinctively shaped environment: a test of Miller and Shettleworth (2007).

Authors:  Anthony McGregor; Murray R Horne; Guillem R Esber; John M Pearce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-07

9.  A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation.

Authors:  K Cheng
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1986-07

10.  Potentiation, overshadowing, and blocking of spatial learning based on the shape of the environment.

Authors:  John M Pearce; Moira Graham; Mark A Good; Peter M Jones; Anthony McGregor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-07
View more
  9 in total

1.  Place recognition and heading retrieval are mediated by dissociable cognitive systems in mice.

Authors:  Joshua B Julian; Alexander T Keinath; Isabel A Muzzio; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The organization of room geometry and object layout geometry in human memory.

Authors:  Julia Sluzenski; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

3.  Potentiation and overshadowing between landmarks and environmental geometric cues.

Authors:  Murray R Horne; John M Pearce
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Overshadowing and blocking between landmark learning and shape learning: the importance of sex differences.

Authors:  Clara A Rodríguez; V D Chamizo; N J Mackintosh
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Spatial learning based on boundaries in rats is hippocampus-dependent and prone to overshadowing.

Authors:  Murray R Horne; Mihaela D Iordanova; John M Pearce
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Shape shifting: Local landmarks interfere with navigation by, and recognition of, global shape.

Authors:  Matthew G Buckley; Alastair D Smith; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Blocking spatial navigation across environments that have a different shape.

Authors:  Matthew G Buckley; Alastair D Smith; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 2.478

8.  The response strategy and the place strategy in a plus-maze have different sensitivities to devaluation of expected outcome.

Authors:  Yutaka Kosaki; John M Pearce; Anthony McGregor
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Distinct and combined responses to environmental geometry and features in a working-memory reorientation task in rats and chicks.

Authors:  Sang Ah Lee; Joseph M Austen; Valeria Anna Sovrano; Giorgio Vallortigara; Anthony McGregor; Colin Lever
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.