Literature DB >> 21472414

Overshadowing and blocking between landmark learning and shape learning: the importance of sex differences.

Clara A Rodríguez1, V D Chamizo, N J Mackintosh.   

Abstract

Rats were trained in a triangular-shaped pool to find a hidden platform that maintained a constant relationship with two sources of information, an individual landmark and one part of the pool with a distinctive shape. In Experiment 1, shape learning overshadowed landmark learning but landmark learning did not overshadow shape learning in males, while landmark learning overshadowed shape learning but shape learning did not overshadow landmark learning in females. In Experiment 2, rats were pretrained either with the single landmark relevant or with the shape relevant, in the absence of the alternative cue. Final test trials, without the platform, revealed reciprocal blocking only in females; in males, shape learning blocked landmark learning, but not viceversa (Experiment 2a). In Experiment 2b, male rats received a longer pretraining with the single landmark relevant, and now landmark learning blocked shape learning. The results thus confirm the claim that males and females partially use different types of spatial information when solving spatial tasks. These results also agree with the suggestion that shape learning interacts with landmark learning in much the same way as does learning about any pair of stimuli in a Pavlovian conditioning experiment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21472414     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-011-0027-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  21 in total

1.  Influence of a beacon on spatial learning based on the shape of the test environment.

Authors:  J M Pearce; J Ward-Robinson; M Good; C Fussell; A Aydin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2001-10

2.  Absence of overshadowing and blocking between landmarks and the geometric cues provided by the shape of a test arena.

Authors:  Andrew Hayward; Anthony McGregor; Mark A Good; John M Pearce
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2003-02

3.  Absence of overshadowing between a landmark and geometric cues in a distinctively shaped environment: a test of Miller and Shettleworth (2007).

Authors:  Anthony McGregor; Murray R Horne; Guillem R Esber; John M Pearce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-07

4.  Organizational effects of early gonadal secretions on sexual differentiation in spatial memory.

Authors:  C L Williams; A M Barnett; W H Meck
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Attention in the pigeon: differential effects of food-getting versus shock-avoidance procedures.

Authors:  D D Foree; V M LoLordo
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1973-12

6.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Are sex differences in navigation caused by sexually dimorphic strategies or by differences in the ability to use the strategies?

Authors:  Deborah M Saucier; Sheryl M Green; Jennifer Leason; Alastair MacFadden; Scott Bell; Lorin J Elias
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Sex differences in directional cue use in a virtual landscape.

Authors:  Xiaoqian J Chai; Lucia F Jacobs
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Potentiation, overshadowing, and blocking of spatial learning based on the shape of the environment.

Authors:  John M Pearce; Moira Graham; Mark A Good; Peter M Jones; Anthony McGregor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-07

10.  Spatial learning based on the shape of the environment is influenced by properties of the objects forming the shape.

Authors:  Moira Graham; Mark A Good; Anthony McGregor; John M Pearce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01
View more
  10 in total

1.  Sex differences after environmental enrichment and physical exercise in rats when solving a navigation task.

Authors:  V D Chamizo; C A Rodríguez; J Sánchez; F Mármol
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Previous Experience Seems Crucial to Eliminate the Sex Gap in Geometry Learning When Solving a Navigation Task in Rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Alejandra Aguilar-Latorre; Víctor Romera-Nicolás; Elisabet Gimeno; V D Chamizo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-09

Review 3.  Sex differences in cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Rena Li; Meharvan Singh
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 8.606

4.  Blocking between landmarks during 2-D (touchscreen) and 3-D (ARENA) search tasks with pigeons.

Authors:  Kenneth J Leising; Jared Wong; Chad M Ruprecht; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Overshadowing of geometric cues by a beacon in a spatial navigation task.

Authors:  Edward S Redhead; Derek A Hamilton; Matthew O Parker; Wai Chan; Craig Allison
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  What makes a landmark effective? Sex differences in a navigation task.

Authors:  V D Chamizo; Clara A Rodríguez; Irene Torres; Marta N Torres; N J Mackintosh
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.926

7.  Sex Differences in Spatial Memory in Brown-Headed Cowbirds: Males Outperform Females on a Touchscreen Task.

Authors:  Mélanie F Guigueno; Scott A MacDougall-Shackleton; David F Sherry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sexual differentiation of contextual fear responses.

Authors:  Lorianna Colon; Natalie Odynocki; Anthony Santarelli; Andrew M Poulos
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.699

Review 9.  Examining the contribution of histone modification to sex differences in learning and memory.

Authors:  Ashley A Keiser; Marcelo A Wood
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Sex difference in cue strategy in a modified version of the Morris water task: correlations between brain and behaviour.

Authors:  Robin J Keeley; Amanda V Tyndall; Gavin A Scott; Deborah M Saucier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.