Literature DB >> 21509462

Potentiation and overshadowing between landmarks and environmental geometric cues.

Murray R Horne1, John M Pearce.   

Abstract

Rats were required in three experiments to find one of two submerged platforms that were situated in the same pair of diagonally opposite corners of a rectangular grey swimming pool. The experimental groups were trained with landmarks, comprising A4 cards attached to the walls, located in the corners containing the platforms. For the control groups, the landmarks were situated in the corners containing the platforms for half of the trials, and in the other corners for the remaining trials. Learning about the positions of the platforms with reference to the shape of the pool was overshadowed in the experimental groups when the landmarks were white, and enhanced when the landmarks were black. A fourth experiment assessed whether geometric cues influenced the control acquired by the landmarks. As in the previous experiments, the presence of the geometric cues overshadowed learning about the landmarks when they were white, but enhanced learning when the landmarks were black.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21509462      PMCID: PMC4231293          DOI: 10.3758/s13420-011-0032-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  25 in total

1.  A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation.

Authors:  K Cheng
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1986-07

2.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Mechanisms of reorientation and object localization by children: a comparison with rats.

Authors:  R F Wang; L Hermer; E S Spelke
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  The geometric module in the rat: independence of shape and feature learning in a food finding task.

Authors:  Patricia L Wall; Leigh C P Botly; Christina K Black; Sara J Shettleworth
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation.

Authors:  L Hermer; E Spelke
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1996-12

6.  Failure of a landmark to restrict spatial learning based on the shape of the environment.

Authors:  Andrew Hayward; Mark A Good; John M Pearce
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2004-10

7.  Transfer of spatial behavior between different environments: implications for theories of spatial learning and for the role of the hippocampus in spatial learning.

Authors:  John M Pearce; Mark A Good; Peter M Jones; Anthony McGregor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-04

8.  Spared feature-structure discrimination but diminished salience of environmental geometry in hippocampal-lesioned homing pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Verner P Bingman; Jonathan T Erichsen; John D Anderson; Mark A Good; John M Pearce
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Potentiation, overshadowing, and blocking of spatial learning based on the shape of the environment.

Authors:  John M Pearce; Moira Graham; Mark A Good; Peter M Jones; Anthony McGregor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-07

10.  Spatial learning based on the shape of the environment is influenced by properties of the objects forming the shape.

Authors:  Moira Graham; Mark A Good; Anthony McGregor; John M Pearce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01
View more
  9 in total

1.  Overshadowing of geometric cues by a beacon in a spatial navigation task.

Authors:  Edward S Redhead; Derek A Hamilton; Matthew O Parker; Wai Chan; Craig Allison
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  What makes a landmark effective? Sex differences in a navigation task.

Authors:  V D Chamizo; Clara A Rodríguez; Irene Torres; Marta N Torres; N J Mackintosh
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.926

3.  Learned predictiveness training modulates biases towards using boundary or landmark cues during navigation.

Authors:  Matthew G Buckley; Alastair D Smith; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Dorsolateral striatal lesions impair navigation based on landmark-goal vectors but facilitate spatial learning based on a "cognitive map".

Authors:  Yutaka Kosaki; Steven L Poulter; Joe M Austen; Anthony McGregor
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Revaluation of geometric cues reduces landmark discrimination via within-compound associations.

Authors:  Joe M Austen; Anthony McGregor
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.926

6.  Shape shifting: Local landmarks interfere with navigation by, and recognition of, global shape.

Authors:  Matthew G Buckley; Alastair D Smith; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The response strategy and the place strategy in a plus-maze have different sensitivities to devaluation of expected outcome.

Authors:  Yutaka Kosaki; John M Pearce; Anthony McGregor
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Distinct and combined responses to environmental geometry and features in a working-memory reorientation task in rats and chicks.

Authors:  Sang Ah Lee; Joseph M Austen; Valeria Anna Sovrano; Giorgio Vallortigara; Anthony McGregor; Colin Lever
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Asymmetry in the discrimination of length during spatial learning.

Authors:  Yutaka Kosaki; Peter M Jones; John M Pearce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2013-05-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.