Literature DB >> 18980401

Blocking of spatial learning between enclosure geometry and a local landmark.

Paul N Wilson1, Tim Alexander.   

Abstract

In a virtual environment, blocking of spatial learning to locate an invisible target was found reciprocally between a distinctively shaped enclosure and a local landmark within its walls. The blocking effect was significantly stronger when the shape of the enclosure rather than the landmark served as the blocking cue. However, the extent to which the landmark blocked enclosure-shape learning was not influenced by increasing the physical salience of the landmark. The outcomes are the first to suggest that cue-interaction effects, commonly found in human and animal contingency learning experiments, are also found in human spatial learning based on landmarks and enclosure walls. The data are discussed in terms of spatial reference frames.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18980401     DOI: 10.1037/a0013011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  8 in total

1.  A landmark blocks searching for a hidden platform in an environment with a distinctive shape after extended pretraining.

Authors:  Murray R Horne; John M Pearce
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Place recognition and heading retrieval are mediated by dissociable cognitive systems in mice.

Authors:  Joshua B Julian; Alexander T Keinath; Isabel A Muzzio; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Overshadowing of geometric cues by a beacon in a spatial navigation task.

Authors:  Edward S Redhead; Derek A Hamilton; Matthew O Parker; Wai Chan; Craig Allison
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  The developmental trajectory of intramaze and extramaze landmark biases in spatial navigation: An unexpected journey.

Authors:  Matthew G Buckley; Mark Haselgrove; Alastair D Smith
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2015-04-06

5.  Failure to demonstrate short-cutting in a replication and extension of Tolman et al.'s spatial learning experiment with humans.

Authors:  Stuart P Wilson; Paul N Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Testing landmark-specific effects on route navigation in an ecologically valid setting: a simulated driving study.

Authors:  Yasaman Jabbari; Darren M Kenney; Martin von Mohrenschildt; Judith M Shedden
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-03-07

7.  Shape shifting: Local landmarks interfere with navigation by, and recognition of, global shape.

Authors:  Matthew G Buckley; Alastair D Smith; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Blocking spatial navigation across environments that have a different shape.

Authors:  Matthew G Buckley; Alastair D Smith; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 2.478

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.