Literature DB >> 19370349

Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score.

Altinay Göksel Karatepe1, Rezzan Günaydin, Taciser Kaya, Uğur Karlibaş, Gülriz Özbek.   

Abstract

The objective is to develop a Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) and to investigate its validity and reliability. The Turkish version of FAOS was developed after the translation and back-translation. The translated version was pretested on 20 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Then, the Turkish FAOS was administered to 55 patients having foot and ankle problems. They were also evaluated by using the four subscales of the Turkish version of AIMS2, and the Turkish version of SF-36 questionnaire to test validity. Fifty patients filled out the FAOS for second time to determine test–retest reliability. Construct validity was investigated with use of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Test–retest reliability was assessed with use of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha score. The psychometric properties of the Turkish FAOS were generally similar to the original FAOS. The random ICC for the five subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.96. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient ranged from 0.79 to 0.97. Construct validity of the FAOS was good. The Turkish FAOS correlated with the SF-36 and AIMS2 scales. The Turkish version of FAOS was valid and reliable instrument to assess the foot and ankle related problems. However, to assess its responsiveness further studies are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19370349     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-009-0929-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  15 in total

1.  Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  E M Roos; S Brandsson; J Karlsson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 2.  The top 10 things foot and ankle specialists wish every primary care physician knew.

Authors:  Neil M Paige; Aksone Nouvong
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 3.  A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability.

Authors:  Holli A DeVon; Michelle E Block; Patricia Moyle-Wright; Diane M Ernst; Susan J Hayden; Deborah J Lazzara; Suzanne M Savoy; Elizabeth Kostas-Polston
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.176

4.  Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).

Authors:  Robroy L Martin; James J Irrgang; Ray G Burdett; Stephen F Conti; Jessie M Van Swearingen
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Reliability and Sensitivity of the Foot and Ankle Disability Index in Subjects With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Sheri A Hale; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?

Authors:  C A McHorney; A R Tarlov
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self-administered outcome measure.

Authors:  E M Roos; H P Roos; L S Lohmander; C Ekdahl; B D Beynnon
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire.

Authors:  R F Meenan; J H Mason; J J Anderson; A A Guccione; L E Kazis
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1992-01

Review 10.  The clinimetric qualities of patient-assessed instruments for measuring chronic ankle instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christophe Eechaute; Peter Vaes; Lieve Van Aerschot; Sara Asman; William Duquet
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  24 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of the foot and ankle outcome score in a community-based study of adults with and without osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Yvonne M Golightly; Robert F Devellis; Amanda E Nelson; Marian T Hannan; L Stefan Lohmander; Jordan B Renner; Joanne M Jordan
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  What is the effect of the early weight-bearing mobilisation without using any support after endoscopy-assisted Achilles tendon repair?

Authors:  Mahmut Nedim Doral
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Banu Ordahan; Ali Yavuz Karahan; Ercan Kaydok
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Reliability and validity of the foot and ankle outcome score: a validation study from Iran.

Authors:  Hossein Negahban; Masood Mazaheri; Mahyar Salavati; Soheil Mansour Sohani; Marjan Askari; Hossein Fanian; Mohamad Parnianpour
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 5.  A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for use in patients with foot or ankle diseases.

Authors:  Yuanxi Jia; Hsiaomin Huang; Joel J Gagnier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  The evaluation of the static and dynamic balance disorders in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Authors:  Mehmet Tuncay Duruoz; Hatice Sule Baklacioglu; Canan Sanal Toprak; Kardelen Gencer Atalay; Mehmet Pamir Atagunduz
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Cross-cultural adaptation, translation, and validation of the Spanish Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaire.

Authors:  Emmanuel Navarro-Flores; Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias; Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo; María Reina-Bueno; Daniel López-López; Carlos Romero-Morales; Patricia Palomo-López; César Calvo-Lobo
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  The Turkish version of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity.

Authors:  Ebru Kaya Mutlu; Derya Celik; Önder Kiliçoglu; Arzu Razak Ozdincler; Katarina Nilsson-Helander
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).

Authors:  Derya Çelik; Melih Malkoç; RobRoy Martin
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  Transcultural adaptation and testing psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS).

Authors:  Kyoung Min Lee; Chin Youb Chung; Soon Sun Kwon; Ki Hyuk Sung; Seung Yeol Lee; Sung Hun Won; Damian J Lee; Seoryong C Lee; Moon Seok Park
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.