Literature DB >> 24817109

The Turkish version of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity.

Ebru Kaya Mutlu1, Derya Celik2, Önder Kiliçoglu3, Arzu Razak Ozdincler2, Katarina Nilsson-Helander4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) is a questionnaire designed to evaluate pain, symptoms, function and physical activity after Achilles tendon rupture. The purpose of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the ATRS into Turkish and to determine its reliability and validity.
METHODS: The ATRS was translated into Turkish in accordance with the stages recommended by Beaton. Seventy-four patients (73 male; average age: 42.3 ± 7.6; range 27-63 years) suffering from previous Achilles tendon ruptures were included for the study. The ATRS-Turkish was administered twice at 7-14 days intervals with 52 of the 74 patients (51 male, average age: 41.8 ± 7.8) to assess the test-retest reliability. Cronbach's α was used for internal consistency, and the inter-rater correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to calculate the test-retest reliability. The Turkish Short-Form-12 (SF-12) and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were employed for validity estimation.
RESULTS: The internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95) and the test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.98) were excellent. The mean interval between the two tests was 7.1 ± 3.1 days. The mean and standard deviation of the first and second assessment of the ATRS were 78.1 ± 23.1 and 79.1 ± 22.5, respectively. The correlation coefficient between the ATRS-Turkish and the FAOS subscales (pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sports and recreational activities, and quality of life) were determined (r = 0.82, r = 0.66, r = 0.79, r = 0.83 and r = 0.60, respectively, p < 0.0001). The ATRS-Turkish displayed good correlation with the SF-12 physical component score (r = 0.63, p < 0.001) and no correlation with the SF-12 mental component score (r = 0.22, p = 0.06).
CONCLUSION: The ATRS-Turkish was found to be reliable and valid for outcome evaluation after Achilles tendon ruptures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24817109     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3042-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  29 in total

1.  A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments.

Authors:  Robert G Marx; Alia Menezes; Lois Horovitz; Edward C Jones; Russell F Warren
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score.

Authors:  Altinay Göksel Karatepe; Rezzan Günaydin; Taciser Kaya; Uğur Karlibaş; Gülriz Özbek
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  [A new score for comparing outcome of surgical management of Achilles tendon ruptures].

Authors:  M Merkel; H W Neumann; H Merk
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Operative versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ryan Wilkins; Leslie J Bisson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Outcomes and complications of operative versus non-operative treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hong-Mou Zhao; Guang-Rong Yu; Yun-Feng Yang; Jia-Qian Zhou; Ashwin Aubeeluck
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  The clinical diagnosis of subcutaneous tear of the Achilles tendon. A prospective study in 174 patients.

Authors:  N Maffulli
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 7.  Total Achilles tendon rupture. A review.

Authors:  J Leppilahti; S Orava
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Cross cultural adaptation of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score with reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluation.

Authors:  Michael R Carmont; Karin Grävare Silbernagel; Katarina Nilsson-Helander; Omer Mei-Dan; Jon Karlsson; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Management of chronic ruptures of the Achilles tendon.

Authors:  Nicola Maffulli; Adam Ajis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system?

Authors:  Gavin Button; Stephen Pinney
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.827

View more
  8 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation and multi-centric validation of the Italian version of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS).

Authors:  Alberto Vascellari; Pietro Spennacchio; Alberto Combi; Alberto Grassi; Silvio Patella; Salvatore Bisicchia; Gian Luigi Canata; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Persian Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score.

Authors:  Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari; Soofia Naghdi; Sahar Hasanvand; Zahra Fakhari; Ramin Kordi; Katarina Nilsson-Helander
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Outcome evaluation after Achilles tendon ruptures. A review of the literature.

Authors:  Pietro Spennacchio; Alberto Vascellari; Davide Cucchi; Gian Luigi Canata; Pietro Randelli
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2016-06-13

4.  The chinese version of achilles tendon total rupture score: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity.

Authors:  Jin Cui; Zhenyu Jia; Xin Zhi; Xiaoqun Li; Xiao Zhai; Liehu Cao; Weizong Weng; Jun Zhang; Lin Wang; Xiao Chen; Jiacan Su
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Reliability and validation of the Dutch Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score.

Authors:  K T M Opdam; R Zwiers; J I Wiegerinck; A E B Kleipool; R Haverlag; J C Goslings; C N van Dijk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score.

Authors:  Paweł Bąkowski; Szymon Rubczak; Maria Wolff-Stefaniak; Monika Grygorowicz; Tomasz Piontek
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Validity and reliability of the Norwegian translation of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score.

Authors:  Ståle Bergman Myhrvold; Øystein Sandnes; Sigurd Erik Hoelsbrekken
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score is a responsive primary outcome measure: an evaluation of the Dutch version including minimally important change.

Authors:  Olivier C Dams; Inge H F Reininga; Johannes Zwerver; Ronald L Diercks; Inge van den Akker-Scheek
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 4.342

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.