Literature DB >> 27136921

Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).

Derya Çelik1, Melih Malkoç2, RobRoy Martin3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To translate and culturally adapt the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) into Turkish and assess the psychometric properties of the translated version.
METHODS: The FAAM was translated into Turkish according to Beaton's recommendations and it is called FAAM-T. Ninety-eight patients (39 males, mean ± SD age 35.0 ± 14.0 years; range 16-71 years) with different foot and ankle complaints were included, and the score was completed twice by each participant after 7 days of the first assessment to assess test-retest reliability based on the inter-rater correlation coefficient, whereas Cronbach's alpha evaluated internal consistency. External validity was evaluated with correlations between the FAAM-T, Foot Function Index (FFI) and Short Form-36 (SF-36). The distribution of floor and ceiling effects was determined.
RESULTS: The test-retest reliability was 0.90 for both FAAM-T subscales. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.95 and 0.91 for FAAM-T activity of daily living (ADL) and FAAM-T Sport subscales, respectively. The FAAM-T ADL and Sport subscales demonstrated very good correlation with the FFI (r = 0.70 and 0.63, respectively). The FAAM-T ADL and Sport subscales had a high level of association with physical functioning and the physical component scale (r = 0.71, r = 0.70 and r = 0.51, r = 0.55, respectively; P = 0.001) of the SF-36. The weakest associations were found between the FAAM-T ADL, FAAM-T Sport subscales and the SF-36 the vitality (r = 0.27, P = 0.008 and r = 0.28, P = 0.01, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The study provides preliminary evidence that the FAAM-T is reliable, valid and responsive outcome measurement of patients with foot and ankle pathologies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle and foot; Cross-cultural adaptation; Outcome measurement; Psychometric properties

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27136921     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-016-3485-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  17 in total

1.  Current challenges in clinimetrics.

Authors:  Henrica C W de Vet; Caroline B Terwee; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients.

Authors:  Lucia Gagliese; Nataly Weizblit; Wendy Ellis; Vincent W S Chan
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability.

Authors:  E Budiman-Mak; K J Conrad; K E Roach
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score.

Authors:  Altinay Göksel Karatepe; Rezzan Günaydin; Taciser Kaya; Uğur Karlibaş; Gülriz Özbek
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status.

Authors:  P J Bennett; C Patterson; S Wearing; T Baglioni
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  1998-09

8.  Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the foot and ankle ability measure.

Authors:  Daisuke Uematsu; Hidetomo Suzuki; Shogo Sasaki; Yasuharu Nagano; Nobuyuki Shinozuka; Norihiko Sunagawa; Toru Fukubayashi
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network.

Authors:  J M Binkley; P W Stratford; S A Lott; D L Riddle
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1999-04

10.  Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for patients with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  T Nauck; H Lohrer
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Diabetic foot disease: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Alberto J Pérez-Panero; María Ruiz-Muñoz; Raúl Fernández-Torres; Cynthia Formosa; Alfred Gatt; Manuel Gónzalez-Sánchez
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the pectus carinatum body image quality of life questionnaire.

Authors:  Nuray Alaca; Dilek Çağrı Aslan; İhsan Alaca; Mustafa Yüksel
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Measurement properties of the most commonly used Foot- and Ankle-Specific Questionnaires: the FFI, FAOS and FAAM. A systematic review.

Authors:  I N Sierevelt; R Zwiers; W Schats; D Haverkamp; C B Terwee; P A Nolte; G M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Foot and Ankle Pathologies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ana Belen Ortega-Avila; Pablo Cervera-Garvi; Laura Ramos-Petersen; Esther Chicharro-Luna; Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-01-27       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Spanish version of The Foot and Ankle Ability Measures (FAAM-Sp).

Authors:  Pablo Cervera-Garvi; Ana Belen Ortega-Avila; Jose Miguel Morales-Asencio; Jose Antonio Cervera-Marin; Rob Roy Martin; Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Validation of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) in individuals with chronic ankle instability: a cross-sectional observational study.

Authors:  Antonio Manoel Goulart Neto; Nicola Maffulli; Filippo Migliorini; Fábio Sprada de Menezes; Rodrigo Okubo
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Assessment of the responsiveness of four scales in geriatric patients with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Mazlum Serdar Akaltun; Burhan Fatih Kocyigit
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.631

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.