Literature DB >> 11642530

Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction.

E M Roos1, S Brandsson, J Karlsson.   

Abstract

We studied the validity and reliability of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) when used to evaluate the outcome of 213 patients (mean age 40 years, 85 females) who underwent anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments with an average postoperative follow-up of 12 years (range, three to 24 years). The FAOS is a 42-item questionnaire assessing patient-relevant outcomes in five separate subscales (Pain, Other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living, Sport and Recreation Function, Foot- and Ankle-Related Quality of Life). The FAOS met set criteria of validity and reliability. The FAOS appears to be useful for the evaluation of patient-relevant outcomes related to ankle reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11642530     DOI： 10.1177/107110070102201004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN： 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  145 in total

1.  Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure.

Authors:  Hanneke Weel; Ruben Zwiers; Donija Azim; Inger N Sierevelt; Daniel Haverkamp; C Niek van Dijk; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Psychometric properties of the foot and ankle outcome score in a community-based study of adults with and without osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Yvonne M Golightly; Robert F Devellis; Amanda E Nelson; Marian T Hannan; L Stefan Lohmander; Jordan B Renner; Joanne M Jordan
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Dorsal calcaneocuboid ligament versus lateral ankle ligament repair: a case-control study.

Authors:  H Lohrer; T Nauck; S Arentz; T J Vogl
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 4.  Surgical Management of Lateral Ankle Instability in Athletes.

Authors:  Luis D Camacho; Zachary T Roward; Yu Deng; L Daniel Latt
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  The victorian institute of sports assessment - achilles questionnaire (visa-a) - a reliable tool for measuring achilles tendinopathy.

Authors:  Jonas Vestergård Iversen; Else Marie Bartels; Henning Langberg
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-02

6.  Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score.

Authors:  Altinay Göksel Karatepe; Rezzan Günaydin; Taciser Kaya; Uğur Karlibaş; Gülriz Özbek
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  What is the effect of the early weight-bearing mobilisation without using any support after endoscopy-assisted Achilles tendon repair?

Authors:  Mahmut Nedim Doral
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Reliability and validity of the foot and ankle outcome score: a validation study from Iran.

Authors:  Hossein Negahban; Masood Mazaheri; Mahyar Salavati; Soheil Mansour Sohani; Marjan Askari; Hossein Fanian; Mohamad Parnianpour
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  The Turkish version of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity.

Authors:  Ebru Kaya Mutlu; Derya Celik; Önder Kiliçoglu; Arzu Razak Ozdincler; Katarina Nilsson-Helander
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in athletes with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Christopher R Carcia; RobRoy L Martin; Joshua M Drouin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.