Literature DB >> 19369221

A novel in vivo method for quantifying the interfacial biochemical bond strength of bone implants.

Young-Taeg Sul1, Carina Johansson, Tomas Albrektsson.   

Abstract

Quantifying the in vivo interfacial biochemical bond strength of bone implants is a biological challenge. We have developed a new and novel in vivo method to identify an interfacial biochemical bond in bone implants and to measure its bonding strength. This method, named biochemical bond measurement (BBM), involves a combination of the implant devices to measure true interfacial bond strength and surface property controls, and thus enables the contributions of mechanical interlocking and biochemical bonding to be distinguished from the measured strength values. We applied the BBM method to a rabbit model, and observed great differences in bone integration between the oxygen (control group) and magnesium (test group) plasma immersion ion-implanted titanium implants (0.046 versus 0.086 MPa, n=10, p=0.005). The biochemical bond in the test implants resulted in superior interfacial behaviour of the implants to bone: (i) close contact to approximately 2 mum thin amorphous interfacial tissue, (ii) pronounced mineralization of the interfacial tissue, (iii) rapid bone healing in contact, and (iv) strong integration to bone. The BBM method can be applied to in vivo experimental models not only to validate the presence of a biochemical bond at the bone-implant interface but also to measure the relative quantity of biochemical bond strength. The present study may provide new avenues for better understanding the role of a biochemical bond involved in the integration of bone implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19369221      PMCID: PMC2839374          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  16 in total

1.  The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant.

Authors:  Young-Taeg Sul
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  A finite element analysis of the push-out test: influence of test conditions.

Authors:  W J Dhert; C C Verheyen; L H Braak; J R de Wijn; C P Klein; K de Groot; P M Rozing
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1992-01

3.  The influence of surface chemistry on implant interface histology: a theoretical basis for implant materials selection.

Authors:  A E Clark; L L Hench; H A Paschall
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1976-03

4.  Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration: an experimental in vivo investigation in the beagle dog.

Authors:  R Brånemark; L O Ohrnell; R Skalak; L Carlsson; P I Brånemark
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Mechanical and morphologic investigation of the tensile strength of a bone-hydroxyapatite interface.

Authors:  J T Edwards; J B Brunski; H W Higuchi
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1997-09-15

6.  Direct chemical bond of bioactive glass-ceramic materials to bone and muscle.

Authors:  L L Hench; H A Paschall
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1973

7.  The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants.

Authors:  Young-Taeg Sul; Carina Johansson; Eungsun Byon; Tomas Albrektsson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark; H A Hansson; J Lindström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981

9.  Tensile bond between bone and titanium: a reappraisal of osseointegration.

Authors:  R Skripitz; P Aspenberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1998-06

10.  Bone-bonding behavior of titanium alloy evaluated mechanically with detaching failure load.

Authors:  K Takatsuka; T Yamamuro; T Nakamura; T Kokubo
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1995-02
View more
  6 in total

1.  An improved mechanical testing method to assess bone-implant anchorage.

Authors:  Spencer Bell; Elnaz Ajami; John E Davies
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Electrochemical growth behavior, surface properties, and enhanced in vivo bone response of TiO2 nanotubes on microstructured surfaces of blasted, screw-shaped titanium implants.

Authors:  Young-Taeg Sul
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2010-04-15

3.  The influence of 1α.25-dihydroxyvitamin d3 coating on implant osseointegration in the rabbit tibia.

Authors:  Yoshihito Naito; Ryo Jimbo; Matthew S Bryington; Stefan Vandeweghe; Bruno R Chrcanovic; Nick Tovar; Tetsuo Ichikawa; Coelho Paulo G; Ann Wennerberg
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2014-10-01

4.  Influence of calcium ion-modified implant surfaces in protein adsorption and implant integration.

Authors:  Eduardo Anitua; Andreia Cerqueira; Francisco Romero-Gavilán; Iñaki García-Arnáez; Cristina Martinez-Ramos; Seda Ozturan; Mikel Azkargorta; Félix Elortza; Mariló Gurruchaga; Isabel Goñi; Julio Suay; Ricardo Tejero
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-04-21

5.  Protein adsorption to surface chemistry and crystal structure modification of titanium surfaces.

Authors:  Ryo Jimbo; Mikael Ivarsson; Anita Koskela; Young-Taeg Sul; Carina B Johansson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2010-10-01

6.  Characteristics of 2 Different Commercially Available Implants with or without Nanotopography.

Authors:  Ali Alenezi; Yoshihito Naito; Martin Andersson; Bruno R Chrcanovic; Ann Wennerberg; Ryo Jimbo
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-10-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.