Literature DB >> 9703411

Tensile bond between bone and titanium: a reappraisal of osseointegration.

R Skripitz1, P Aspenberg.   

Abstract

When Branemark in the 1970s established the term osseointegration, this implied a direct chemical bond between a titanium implant and bone. However, ultrastructural studies seemed not to support this idea, and osseointegration came to be defined as the absence of interfering fibrous tissue. Titanium was therefore described as bioinert rather than bioactive. We now demonstrate mechanically a chemical bond between bone and titanium, using unloaded cp titanium plates, similar to those used in previous studies on prosthetic loosening. Tensile force can be transmitted only by chemical bonds. Bone-bonding was therefore evaluated by a detachment test. The plates were developed so that a flat titanium surface touched traumatized bone and the rest of the detachable part had no contact with surrounding tissue. The titanium plates were either polished and sterilized in an autoclave or treated in 4 M NaOH and then heated to 600 degrees C according to Yan et al. (1996). After 4 weeks, the plates were separated from the bone by a perpendicular traction force. The detaching load of the untreated titanium plates never exceeded 0.03 MPa, whereas with treatment it increased to median 0.8 MPa, with bone remaining attached to parts of the plates after detachment. Our findings confirm that a chemical bond can be obtained within 4 weeks with the described pretreatment. It may occur also without treatment, after a longer implantation time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9703411     DOI: 10.3109/17453679809000938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  7 in total

1.  Effect of the initial implant fitting on the predicted secondary stability of a cementless stem.

Authors:  M Viceconti; A Pancanti; M Dotti; F Traina; L Cristofolini
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Numerical model to predict the long-term mechanical stability of cementless orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  M Viceconti; S Ricci; A Pancanti; A Cappello
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  A novel in vivo method for quantifying the interfacial biochemical bond strength of bone implants.

Authors:  Young-Taeg Sul; Carina Johansson; Tomas Albrektsson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Clinical outcomes and complications of titanium versus stainless steel elastic nail in management of paediatric femoral fractures-a systematic review.

Authors:  Abdalla Mohamed; Aysha Sethunathan Rajeev
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-11-12

Review 5.  Flexible intramedullary nailing in the treatment of forearm fractures in children and adolescents, a systematic review.

Authors:  Frideriki Poutoglidou; Dimitrios Metaxiotis; Christos Kazas; Dimitrios Alvanos; Anastasios Mpeletsiotis
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-14

Review 6.  Dental implant systems.

Authors:  Yoshiki Oshida; Elif B Tuna; Oya Aktören; Koray Gençay
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Precipitation of Calcium Phosphates in the Presence of Collagen Type I on Four Different Bioactive Titanium Surfaces: an in Vitro Study.

Authors:  Victoria F Stenport; Julia Olander; Per Kjellin; Fredrik Currie; Young-Taeg Sul; Arvidsson Anna
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2015-12-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.