Literature DB >> 21450731

Genomic sweep and potential genetic rescue during limiting environmental conditions in an isolated wolf population.

Jennifer R Adams1, Leah M Vucetich, Philip W Hedrick, Rolf O Peterson, John A Vucetich.   

Abstract

Genetic rescue, in which the introduction of one or more unrelated individuals into an inbred population results in the reduction of detrimental genetic effects and an increase in one or more vital rates, is a potentially important management tool for mitigating adverse effects of inbreeding. We used molecular techniques to document the consequences of a male wolf (Canis lupus) that immigrated, on its own, across Lake Superior ice to the small, inbred wolf population in Isle Royale National Park. The immigrant's fitness so exceeded that of native wolves that within 2.5 generations, he was related to every individual in the population and his ancestry constituted 56 per cent of the population, resulting in a selective sweep of the total genome. In other words, all the male ancestry (50% of the total ancestry) descended from this immigrant, plus 6 per cent owing to the success of some of his inbred offspring. The immigration event occurred in an environment where space was limiting (i.e. packs occupied all available territories) and during a time when environmental conditions had deteriorated (i.e. wolves' prey declined). These conditions probably explain why the immigration event did not obviously improve the population's demography (e.g. increased population numbers or growth rate). Our results show that the beneficial effects of gene flow may be substantial and quickly manifest, short-lived under some circumstances, and how the demographic benefits of genetic rescue might be masked by environmental conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21450731      PMCID: PMC3177630          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  30 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Y chromosome haplotyping in Scandinavian wolves (Canis lupus) based on microsatellite markers.

Authors:  A K Sundqvist; H Ellegren; M Olivier; C Vilà
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Rescue of a severely bottlenecked wolf (Canis lupus) population by a single immigrant.

Authors:  Carles Vilà; Anna-Karin Sundqvist; Øystein Flagstad; Jennifer Seddon; Susanne Björnerfeldt; Ilpo Kojola; Adriano Casulli; Håkan Sand; Petter Wabakken; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel Falush; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A simulation study on detecting purging of inbreeding depression in captive populations.

Authors:  Elizabeth Boakes; Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue.

Authors:  David A Tallmon; Gordon Luikart; Robin S Waples
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Heterosis and outbreeding depression in descendants of natural immigrants to an inbred population of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia).

Authors:  Amy B Marr; Lukas F Keller; Peter Arcese
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Chromosome-specific single-locus FISH probes allow anchorage of an 1800-marker integrated radiation-hybrid/linkage map of the domestic dog genome to all chromosomes.

Authors:  M Breen; S Jouquand; C Renier; C S Mellersh; C Hitte; N G Holmes; A Chéron; N Suter; F Vignaux; A E Bristow; C Priat; E McCann; C André; S Boundy; P Gitsham; R Thomas; W L Bridge; H F Spriggs; E J Ryder; A Curson; J Sampson; E A Ostrander; M M Binns; F Galibert
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  A 1-Mb resolution radiation hybrid map of the canine genome.

Authors:  Richard Guyon; Travis D Lorentzen; Christophe Hitte; Lisa Kim; Edouard Cadieu; Heidi G Parker; Pascale Quignon; Jennifer K Lowe; Corinne Renier; Boris Gelfenbeyn; Françoise Vignaux; Hawkins B DeFrance; Stephanie Gloux; Gregory G Mahairas; Catherine André; Francis Galibert; Elaine A Ostrander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The influence of top-down, bottom-up and abiotic factors on the moose (Alces alces) population of Isle Royale.

Authors:  John A Vucetich; Rolf O Peterson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  27 in total

1.  Efficient mitigation of founder effects during the establishment of a leading-edge oak population.

Authors:  Arndt Hampe; Marie-Hélène Pemonge; Rémy J Petit
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genetic variation during range expansion: effects of habitat novelty and hybridization.

Authors:  Amanda A Pierce; Rafael Gutierrez; Amber M Rice; Karin S Pfennig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Evolutionary rescue in vertebrates: evidence, applications and uncertainty.

Authors:  E Vander Wal; D Garant; M Festa-Bianchet; F Pelletier
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The genetic rescue of two bottlenecked South Island robin populations using translocations of inbred donors.

Authors:  S Heber; A Varsani; S Kuhn; A Girg; B Kempenaers; J Briskie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Hybridization as a facilitator of species range expansion.

Authors:  Karin S Pfennig; Audrey L Kelly; Amanda A Pierce
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Interactions between demography, genetics, and landscape connectivity increase extinction probability for a small population of large carnivores in a major metropolitan area.

Authors:  John F Benson; Peter J Mahoney; Jeff A Sikich; Laurel E K Serieys; John P Pollinger; Holly B Ernest; Seth P D Riley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Genetic rescue in an inbred Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) population.

Authors:  Malin Hasselgren; Anders Angerbjörn; Nina E Eide; Rasmus Erlandsson; Øystein Flagstad; Arild Landa; Johan Wallén; Karin Norén
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Choosy Wolves? Heterozygote Advantage But No Evidence of MHC-Based Disassortative Mating.

Authors:  Marco Galaverni; Romolo Caniglia; Pietro Milanesi; Silvana Lapalombella; Elena Fabbri; Ettore Randi
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Low Persistence of Genetic Rescue Across Generations in the Arctic Fox (Vulpes lagopus).

Authors:  Anna Lotsander; Malin Hasselgren; Malin Larm; Johan Wallén; Anders Angerbjörn; Karin Norén
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.645

10.  What the Inbred Scandinavian Wolf Population Tells Us about the Nature of Conservation.

Authors:  Jannikke Räikkönen; John A Vucetich; Leah M Vucetich; Rolf O Peterson; Michael P Nelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.