Literature DB >> 27586784

Signal type and signal-to-noise ratio interact to affect cortical auditory evoked potentials.

Curtis J Billings1, Leslie D Grush1.   

Abstract

Use of speech signals and background noise is emerging in cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) studies; however, the interaction between signal type and noise level remains unclear. Two experiments determined the interaction between signal type and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on CAEPs. Three signals (syllable /ba/, 1000-Hz tone, and the /ba/ envelope with 1000-Hz fine structure) with varying SNRs were used in two experiments, demonstrating signal-by-SNR interactions due to both envelope and spectral characteristics. When using real-world stimuli such as speech to evoke CAEPs, temporal and spectral complexity leads to differences with traditional tonal stimuli, especially when presented in background noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27586784      PMCID: PMC5848827          DOI: 10.1121/1.4959600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Cortical encoding of signals in noise: effects of stimulus type and recording paradigm.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Keri O Bennett; Michelle R Molis; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  Speech evoked potentials: from the laboratory to the clinic.

Authors:  Brett A Martin; Kelly L Tremblay; Peggy Korczak
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials.

Authors:  S Onishi; H Davis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Children's auditory event-related potentials index sound complexity and "speechness".

Authors:  R Ceponiene; A Shestakova; P Balan; P Alku; K Yiaguchi; R Näätänen
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.292

5.  Summed evoked responses using pure-tone stimuli.

Authors:  G A McCandless; L Best
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1966-06

6.  Electromagnetic recordings reveal latency differences in speech and tone processing in humans.

Authors:  H Tiitinen; P Sivonen; P Alku; J Virtanen; R Näätänen
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1999-10-25

7.  Auditory long latency responses to tonal and speech stimuli.

Authors:  Shannon Swink; Andrew Stuart
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Kelly L Tremblay; G Christopher Stecker; Wendy M Tolin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Tina M Penman; Garnett P McMillan; Emily M Ellis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Background noise can enhance cortical auditory evoked potentials under certain conditions.

Authors:  Melissa A Papesh; Curtis J Billings; Lucas S Baltzell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Evolution of auditory response signal-to-noise ratio in ascending auditory pathways].

Authors:  J Wang; C Song; F Liang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2021-11-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.