Literature DB >> 12002886

Significance of auditory and kinesthetic feedback to singers' pitch control.

Dirk Mürbe1, Friedemann Pabst, Gert Hofmann, Johan Sundberg.   

Abstract

An accurate control of fundamental frequency (F0) is required from singers. This control relies on auditory and kinesthetic feedback. However, a loud accompaniment may mask the auditory feedback, leaving the singers to rely on kinesthetic feedback. The object of the present study was to estimate the significance of auditory and kinesthetic feedback to pitch control in 28 students beginning a professional solo singing education. The singers sang an ascending and descending triad pattern covering their entire pitch range with and without masking noise in legato and staccato and in a slow and a fast tempo. F0 was measured by means of a computer program. The interval sizes between adjacent tones were determined and their departures from equally tempered tuning were calculated. The deviations from this tuning were used as a measure of the accuracy of intonation. Statistical analysis showed a significant effect of masking that amounted to a mean impairment of pitch accuracy by 14 cent across all subjects. Furthermore, significant effects were found of tempo as well as of the staccato/legato conditions. The results indicate that auditory feedback contributes significantly to singers' control of pitch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12002886     DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00071-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  12 in total

1.  Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in sensory control of voice production.

Authors:  Amy L Parkinson; Sabina G Flagmeier; Jordan L Manes; Charles R Larson; Bill Rogers; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Voice responses to changes in pitch of voice or tone auditory feedback.

Authors:  Mahalakshmi Sivasankar; Jay J Bauer; Tara Babu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  [Medical treatment of singers' voices].

Authors:  B Richter; M Echternach
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Interactions between auditory and somatosensory feedback for voice F0 control.

Authors:  Charles R Larson; Kenneth W Altman; Hanjun Liu; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Attenuation of vocal responses to pitch perturbations during Mandarin speech.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Yi Xu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The role of auditory and kinaesthetic feedback mechanisms on phonatory stability in children.

Authors:  S B Rathna Kumar; Suhail Azeem; Abhishek Kumar Choudhary; S G R Prakash
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-03-17

7.  Acquired and congenital disorders of sung performance: A review.

Authors:  Magdalena Berkowska; Simone Dalla Bella
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-11-12

8.  Auditory-motor mapping for pitch control in singers and nonsingers.

Authors:  Jeffery A Jones; Dwayne Keough
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effect of Training and Level of External Auditory Feedback on the Singing Voice: Pitch Inaccuracy.

Authors:  Pasquale Bottalico; Simone Graetzer; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Disorders of pitch production in tone deafness.

Authors:  Simone Dalla Bella; Magdalena Berkowska; Jakub Sowiński
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.