Literature DB >> 18340440

Interactions between auditory and somatosensory feedback for voice F0 control.

Charles R Larson1, Kenneth W Altman, Hanjun Liu, Timothy C Hain.   

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of both kinesthetic and auditory feedback for control of voice fundamental frequency (F0). In the present study, a possible interaction between auditory feedback and kinesthetic feedback for control of voice F0 was tested by administering local anesthetic to the vocal folds in the presence of perturbations in voice pitch feedback. Responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback were larger when the vocal fold mucosa was anesthetized than during normal kinesthesia. A mathematical model incorporating a linear combination of kinesthesia and pitch feedback simulated the main aspects of our experimental results. This model indicates that a feasible explanation for the increase in response magnitude with vocal fold anesthesia is that the vocal motor system uses both pitch and kinesthesia to stabilize voice F0 shortly after a perturbation of voice pitch feedback has been perceived.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18340440      PMCID: PMC2763543          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1330-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex.

Authors:  T C Hain; T A Burnett; S Kiran; C R Larson; S Singh; M K Kenney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Postural responses to combinations of head and body displacements: vestibular-somatosensory interactions.

Authors:  F B Horak; G M Earhart; V Dietz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions.

Authors:  C R Larson; T A Burnett; J J Bauer; S Kiran; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables.

Authors:  Thomas M Donath; Ulrich Natke; Karl Th Kalveram
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency of long stressed and unstressed syllables.

Authors:  U Natke; K T Kalveram
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Significance of auditory and kinesthetic feedback to singers' pitch control.

Authors:  Dirk Mürbe; Friedemann Pabst; Gert Hofmann; Johan Sundberg
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Laryngeal phonatory reflex. The effect of anesthetization of the internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve: Acoustic aspects.

Authors:  M Tanabe; K Kitajima; W J Gould
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1975 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Mucosal afferents mediate laryngeal adductor responses in the cat.

Authors:  Richard D Andreatta; Eric A Mann; Christopher J Poletto; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-11

9.  Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences.

Authors:  Yi Xu; Charles R Larson; Jay J Bauer; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Proceedings: Laryngeal myotatic reflexes and phonation.

Authors:  B D Wyke
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr (Basel)       Date:  1974
View more
  56 in total

1.  Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in sensory control of voice production.

Authors:  Amy L Parkinson; Sabina G Flagmeier; Jordan L Manes; Charles R Larson; Bill Rogers; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Covariation among vowel height effects on acoustic measures.

Authors:  Jeff Berry; Maura Moyle
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of tonal native language on voice fundamental frequency responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalizations.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Emily Q Wang; Zhaocong Chen; Peng Liu; Charles R Larson; Dongfeng Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effects of stimulus complexity on the preattentive processing of self-generated and nonself voices: An ERP study.

Authors:  Tatiana Conde; Óscar F Gonçalves; Ana P Pinheiro
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Attenuation of vocal responses to pitch perturbations during Mandarin speech.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Yi Xu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Age-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Nicole M Russo; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Compensations in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitudes.

Authors:  Ewen N MacDonald; Robyn Goldberg; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Voice-related modulation of mechanosensory detection thresholds in the human larynx.

Authors:  Michael J Hammer; Mallory A Krueger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Laryngeal somatosensory deficits in Parkinson's disease: implications for speech respiratory and phonatory control.

Authors:  Michael J Hammer; Steven M Barlow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.