Literature DB >> 19351756

FDG-PET/CT imaging predicts histopathologic treatment responses after the initial cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas.

Matthias R Benz1, Johannes Czernin, Martin S Allen-Auerbach, William D Tap, Sarah M Dry, David Elashoff, Kira Chow, Vladimir Evilevitch, Jeff J Eckardt, Michael E Phelps, Wolfgang A Weber, Fritz C Eilber.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), the early assessment of treatment responses is important. Using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), we determined whether changes in tumor FDG uptake predict histopathologic treatment responses in high-grade STS after the initial cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: From February 2006 to March 2008, 50 patients with resectable high-grade STS scheduled for neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent tumor resection were enrolled prospectively. FDG-PET/CT before (baseline), after the first cycle (early follow-up), and after completion of neoadjuvant therapy (late follow-up) was done. Tumor FDG uptake and changes were measured by standardized uptake values. Histopathologic examination of the resected specimen provided an assessment of treatment response. Patients with > or = 95% pathologic necrosis were classified as treatment responders. FDG-PET/CT results were compared with histopathologic findings.
RESULTS: At early follow-up, FDG uptake decreased significantly more in 8 (16%) responders than in the 42 (84%) nonresponders (-55% versus -23%; P = 0.002). All responders and 14 of 42 nonresponders had a > or = 35% reduction in standardized uptake value between baseline and early follow-up. Using a > or = 35% reduction in FDG uptake as early metabolic response threshold resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for histopathologic response of 100% and 67%, respectively. Applying a higher threshold at late follow-up improved specificity but not sensitivity. CT had no value at response prediction.
CONCLUSION: A 35% reduction in tumor FDG uptake at early follow-up is a sensitive predictor of histopathologic tumor response. Early treatment decisions such as discontinuation of chemotherapy in nonresponding patients could be based on FDG-PET criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19351756      PMCID: PMC4068269          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  36 in total

1.  Value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer for prediction of pathologic response and times to relapse after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Christoph Pöttgen; Sabine Levegrün; Dirk Theegarten; Simone Marnitz; Sara Grehl; Roman Pink; Wilfried Eberhardt; Georgios Stamatis; Thomas Gauler; Gerald Antoch; Andreas Bockisch; Martin Stuschke
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials.

Authors:  Lalitha K Shankar; John M Hoffman; Steve Bacharach; Michael M Graham; Joel Karp; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Steven Larson; David A Mankoff; Barry A Siegel; Annick Van den Abbeele; Jeffrey Yap; Daniel Sullivan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Positron-emission tomography and assessment of cancer therapy.

Authors:  Malik E Juweid; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Prognostic relevance of response evaluation using [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Corneline J Hoekstra; Sigrid G Stroobants; Egbert F Smit; Johan Vansteenkiste; Harm van Tinteren; Pieter E Postmus; Richard P Golding; Bonne Biesma; Frans J H M Schramel; Nico van Zandwijk; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Otto S Hoekstra
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Positron emission tomography as an imaging biomarker.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Optimizing imaging protocols for overweight and obese patients: a lutetium orthosilicate PET/CT study.

Authors:  Benjamin S Halpern; Magnus Dahlbom; Martin A Auerbach; Christiaan Schiepers; Barbara J Fueger; Wolfgang A Weber; Daniel H S Silverman; Osman Ratib; Johannes Czernin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Metabolic imaging predicts response, survival, and recurrence in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Katja Ott; Wolfgang A Weber; Florian Lordick; Karen Becker; Raymonde Busch; Ken Herrmann; Hinrich Wieder; Ulrich Fink; Markus Schwaiger; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Early response evaluation in malignant pleural mesothelioma by positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose.

Authors:  Giovanni L Ceresoli; Arturo Chiti; Paolo A Zucali; Marcello Rodari; Romano F Lutman; Silvia Salamina; Matteo Incarbone; Marco Alloisio; Armando Santoro
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the management of high-risk, high-grade, soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and body wall: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 9514.

Authors:  William G Kraybill; Jonathon Harris; Ira J Spiro; David S Ettinger; Thomas F DeLaney; Ronald H Blum; David R Lucas; David C Harmon; G Douglas Letson; Burton Eisenberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Monitoring of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Caroline Rousseau; Anne Devillers; Christine Sagan; Ludovic Ferrer; Boumédiène Bridji; Loïc Campion; Myriam Ricaud; Emmanuelle Bourbouloux; Isabelle Doutriaux; Martine Clouet; Dominique Berton-Rigaud; Catherine Bouriel; Valérie Delecroix; Etienne Garin; Sophie Rouquette; Isabelle Resche; Pierre Kerbrat; Jean François Chatal; Mario Campone
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  53 in total

Review 1.  Moving beyond response criteria: new measures of success in the treatment of sarcomas.

Authors:  Andrew E Hendifar; Elke Ahlmann; Daniel C Allison; James Hu; Lawrence Menendez; Sant P Chawla
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2012-09

Review 2.  Computerized PET/CT image analysis in the evaluation of tumour response to therapy.

Authors:  W Lu; J Wang; H H Zhang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  [Current state of neoadjuvant therapy of soft tissue sarcoma].

Authors:  M Lehnhardt; T Schmitt; M Bischof; A Daigeler; G Egerer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  18F-FDG PET response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma are different.

Authors:  Louie L Gaston; Claudia Di Bella; John Slavin; Rodney J Hicks; Peter F M Choong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Monitoring cancer therapy with PET: probably effective, but more research is needed.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Therapy Response Assessment of Pediatric Tumors with Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG PET/MRI.

Authors:  Ashok J Theruvath; Florian Siedek; Anne M Muehe; Jordi Garcia-Diaz; Julian Kirchner; Ole Martin; Michael P Link; Sheri Spunt; Allison Pribnow; Jarrett Rosenberg; Ken Herrmann; Sergios Gatidis; Jürgen F Schäfer; Michael Moseley; Lale Umutlu; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  High-grade soft-tissue sarcoma: optimizing injection improves MRI evaluation of tumor response.

Authors:  Amandine Crombé; François Le Loarer; François Cornelis; Eberhardt Stoeckle; Xavier Buy; Sophie Cousin; Antoine Italiano; Michèle Kind
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Sarcoma mid-therapy [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) and patient outcome.

Authors:  Janet F Eary; Ernest U Conrad; Janet O'Sullivan; Douglas S Hawkins; Scott M Schuetze; Finbarr O'Sullivan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  PET/CT Assessment of Response to Therapy: Tumor Change Measurement, Truth Data, and Error.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Robert K Doot; Michelle Wanner-Roybal; Luc M Bidaut; Samuel G Armato; Charles R Meyer; Geoffrey McLennan
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  FDG-PET/CT Imaging Predicts Histopathologic Treatment Responses after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Adult Primary Bone Sarcomas.

Authors:  Matthias R Benz; Johannes Czernin; William D Tap; Jeffrey J Eckardt; Leanne L Seeger; Martin S Allen-Auerbach; Sarah M Dry; Michael E Phelps; Wolfgang A Weber; Fritz C Eilber
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2010-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.