Literature DB >> 25723599

Computerized PET/CT image analysis in the evaluation of tumour response to therapy.

W Lu1, J Wang, H H Zhang.   

Abstract

Current cancer therapy strategy is mostly population based, however, there are large differences in tumour response among patients. It is therefore important for treating physicians to know individual tumour response. In recent years, many studies proposed the use of computerized positron emission tomography/CT image analysis in the evaluation of tumour response. Results showed that computerized analysis overcame some major limitations of current qualitative and semiquantitative analysis and led to improved accuracy. In this review, we summarize these studies in four steps of the analysis: image registration, tumour segmentation, image feature extraction and response evaluation. Future works are proposed and challenges described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25723599      PMCID: PMC4651254          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  100 in total

1.  In regard to Paulino and Johnstone: Use of PET and CT imaging data in radiation therapy planning. Int J Radit Oncol Biol Phys 2004;59:4-5.

Authors:  Michael MacManus; Rod Hicks; Michael Bayne; Trevor Leong; Lester Peters; David Ball
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Esophageal cancer: CT, endoscopic US, and FDG PET for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy--systematic review.

Authors:  Marinke Westerterp; Henderik L van Westreenen; Johannes B Reitsma; Otto S Hoekstra; Jaap Stoker; Paul Fockens; Pieter L Jager; Berthe L F Van Eck-Smit; John T M Plukker; J Jan B van Lanschot; Gerrit W Sloof
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Detection and characterization of tumor changes in 18F-FDG PET patient monitoring using parametric imaging.

Authors:  Hatem Necib; Camilo Garcia; Antoine Wagner; Bruno Vanderlinden; Patrick Emonts; Alain Hendlisz; Patrick Flamen; Irène Buvat
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  PET imaging with [11C]methyl- L-methionine for therapy monitoring in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hinrich Wieder; Katja Ott; Frank Zimmermann; Hjalmar Nekarda; Jens Stollfuss; Petra Watzlowik; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Ulrich Fink; Karen Becker; Markus Schwaiger; Wolfgang Andreas Weber
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-03-13       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Tumor Treatment Response Based on Visual and Quantitative Changes in Global Tumor Glycolysis Using PET-FDG Imaging. The Visual Response Score and the Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis.

Authors:  Steven M. Larson; Yusuf Erdi; Timothy Akhurst; Madhu Mazumdar; Homer A. Macapinlac; Ronald D. Finn; Cecille Casilla; Melissa Fazzari; Neil Srivastava; Henry W.D. Yeung; John L. Humm; Jose Guillem; Robert Downey; Martin Karpeh; Alfred E. Cohen; Robert Ginsberg
Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging       Date:  1999-05

Review 6.  Predictive and prognostic value of FDG-PET in nonsmall-cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Henricus F M van der Heijden; Frans H M Corstens; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Andriy Marusyk; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-11-18

8.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Combined assessment of metabolic and volumetric changes for assessment of tumor response in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Matthias R Benz; Martin S Allen-Auerbach; Fritz C Eilber; Hui J J Chen; Sarah Dry; Michael E Phelps; Johannes Czernin; Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Modeling pathologic response of esophageal cancer to chemoradiation therapy using spatial-temporal 18F-FDG PET features, clinical parameters, and demographics.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Shan Tan; Wengen Chen; Seth Kligerman; Grace Kim; Warren D D'Souza; Mohan Suntharalingam; Wei Lu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Towards precision medicine: from quantitative imaging to radiomics.

Authors:  U Rajendra Acharya; Yuki Hagiwara; Vidya K Sudarshan; Wai Yee Chan; Kwan Hoong Ng
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018 Jan.       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 2.  Texture analysis of medical images for radiotherapy applications.

Authors:  Elisa Scalco; Giovanna Rizzo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Accurate segmenting of cervical tumors in PET imaging based on similarity between adjacent slices.

Authors:  Liyuan Chen; Chenyang Shen; Zhiguo Zhou; Genevieve Maquilan; Kimberly Thomas; Michael R Folkert; Kevin Albuquerque; Jing Wang
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  Positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for tumor response assessment-a review of clinical practices and radiomics studies.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Wengen Chen
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.241

5.  Adaptive region-growing with maximum curvature strategy for tumor segmentation in 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Shan Tan; Laquan Li; Wookjin Choi; Min Kyu Kang; Warren D D'Souza; Wei Lu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  In silico cancer research towards 3R.

Authors:  Claire Jean-Quartier; Fleur Jeanquartier; Igor Jurisica; Andreas Holzinger
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.