Literature DB >> 32368961

Therapy Response Assessment of Pediatric Tumors with Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG PET/MRI.

Ashok J Theruvath1, Florian Siedek1, Anne M Muehe1, Jordi Garcia-Diaz1, Julian Kirchner1, Ole Martin1, Michael P Link1, Sheri Spunt1, Allison Pribnow1, Jarrett Rosenberg1, Ken Herrmann1, Sergios Gatidis1, Jürgen F Schäfer1, Michael Moseley1, Lale Umutlu1, Heike E Daldrup-Link1.   

Abstract

Background Whole-body diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI can help detect cancer with high sensitivity. However, the assessment of therapy response often requires information about tumor metabolism, which is measured with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET. Purpose To compare tumor therapy response with whole-body DW MRI and FDG PET/MRI in children and young adults. Materials and Methods In this prospective, nonrandomized multicenter study, 56 children and young adults (31 male and 25 female participants; mean age, 15 years ± 4 [standard deviation]; age range, 6-22 years) with lymphoma or sarcoma underwent 112 simultaneous whole-body DW MRI and FDG PET/MRI between June 2015 and December 2018 before and after induction chemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01542879). The authors measured minimum tumor apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) of up to six target lesions and assessed therapy response after induction chemotherapy according to the Lugano classification or PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors. The authors evaluated agreements between whole-body DW MRI- and FDG PET/MRI-based response classifications with Krippendorff α statistics. Differences in minimum ADC and maximum SUV between responders and nonresponders and comparison of timing for discordant and concordant response assessments after induction chemotherapy were evaluated with the Wilcoxon test. Results Good agreement existed between treatment response assessments after induction chemotherapy with whole-body DW MRI and FDG PET/MRI (α = 0.88). Clinical response prediction according to maximum SUV (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 100%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 99%, 100%) and minimum ADC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 98%; 95% CI: 94%, 100%) were similar (P = .37). Sensitivity and specificity were 96% (54 of 56 participants; 95% CI: 86%, 99%) and 100% (56 of 56 participants; 95% CI: 54%, 100%), respectively, for DW MRI and 100% (56 of 56 participants; 95% CI: 93%, 100%) and 100% (56 of 56 participants; 95% CI: 54%, 100%) for FDG PET/MRI. In eight of 56 patients who underwent imaging after induction chemotherapy in the early posttreatment phase, chemotherapy-induced changes in tumor metabolism preceded changes in proton diffusion (P = .002). Conclusion Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI showed significant agreement with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI for treatment response assessment in children and young adults. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32368961      PMCID: PMC7325702          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020192508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  42 in total

1.  Declining childhood and adolescent cancer mortality.

Authors:  Malcolm A Smith; Sean F Altekruse; Peter C Adamson; Gregory H Reaman; Nita L Seibel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Feasibility of Multiparametric Imaging with PET/MR in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jacob H Rasmussen; Martin Nørgaard; Adam E Hansen; Ivan R Vogelius; Marianne C Aznar; Helle H Johannesen; Junia Costa; Astrid M E Engberg; Andreas Kjær; Lena Specht; Barbara M Fischer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Malignant astrocytic tumors: clinical importance of apparent diffusion coefficient in prediction of grade and prognosis.

Authors:  Shuichi Higano; Xia Yun; Toshihiro Kumabe; Mika Watanabe; Shunji Mugikura; Atsushi Umetsu; Akihiro Sato; Takayuki Yamada; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Monitoring therapeutic responses of primary bone tumors by diffusion-weighted image: Initial results.

Authors:  Yoshiko Hayashida; Toshitake Yakushiji; Kazuo Awai; Kazuhiro Katahira; Yoshiharu Nakayama; Osamu Shimomura; Mika Kitajima; Toshinori Hirai; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Hiroshi Mizuta
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Ionising radiation-free whole-body MRI versus (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT scans for children and young adults with cancer: a prospective, non-randomised, single-centre study.

Authors:  Christopher Klenk; Rakhee Gawande; Lebriz Uslu; Aman Khurana; Deqiang Qiu; Andrew Quon; Jessica Donig; Jarrett Rosenberg; Sandra Luna-Fineman; Michael Moseley; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for tumour response assessment: why, when and how?

Authors:  A Afaq; A Andreou; D M Koh
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  Metastatic ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: assessing chemotherapy response with diffusion-weighted MR imaging--value of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients.

Authors:  Stavroula Kyriazi; David J Collins; Christina Messiou; Kjell Pennert; Robert L Davidson; Sharon L Giles; Stan B Kaye; Nandita M Desouza
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Ann C Mertens; Charles A Sklar; Toana Kawashima; Melissa M Hudson; Anna T Meadows; Debra L Friedman; Neyssa Marina; Wendy Hobbie; Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Cindy L Schwartz; Wendy Leisenring; Leslie L Robison
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 176.079

9.  Whole-body MRI for staging and interim response monitoring in paediatric and adolescent Hodgkin's lymphoma: a comparison with multi-modality reference standard including 18F-FDG-PET-CT.

Authors:  Arash Latifoltojar; Shonit Punwani; Andre Lopes; Paul D Humphries; Maria Klusmann; Leon Jonathan Menezes; Stephen Daw; Ananth Shankar; Deena Neriman; Heather Fitzke; Laura Clifton-Hadley; Paul Smith; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Radiation Exposure From Pediatric CT Scans and Subsequent Cancer Risk in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Johanna M Meulepas; Cécile M Ronckers; Anne M J B Smets; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Patrycja Gradowska; Choonsik Lee; Andreas Jahnen; Marcel van Straten; Marie-Claire Y de Wit; Bernard Zonnenberg; Willemijn M Klein; Johannes H Merks; Otto Visser; Flora E van Leeuwen; Michael Hauptmann
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  PET/MR of pediatric bone tumors: what the radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Jennifer Padwal; Lucia Baratto; Amit Chakraborty; Kristina Hawk; Sheri Spunt; Raffi Avedian; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  PET/MRI Improves Management of Children with Cancer.

Authors:  Lucia Baratto; K Elizabeth Hawk; Lisa States; Jing Qi; Sergios Gatidis; Louise Kiru; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Early Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted MRI Helps Predict Long-term Outcome Following Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Vincent Vandecaveye; Raphaëla C Dresen; Elin Pauwels; Sofie Van Binnebeek; Ragna Vanslembrouck; Kristof Baete; Felix M Mottaghy; Paul M Clement; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Eric Van Cutsem; Chris Verslype; Frederik De Keyzer; Christophe M Deroose
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2022-05

4.  Validation of Deep Learning-based Augmentation for Reduced 18F-FDG Dose for PET/MRI in Children and Young Adults with Lymphoma.

Authors:  Ashok J Theruvath; Florian Siedek; Ketan Yerneni; Anne M Muehe; Sheri L Spunt; Allison Pribnow; Michael Moseley; Ying Lu; Qian Zhao; Praveen Gulaka; Akshay Chaudhari; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-10-06

Review 5.  One-stop local and whole-body staging of children with cancer.

Authors:  Heike E Daldrup-Link; Ashok J Theruvath; Lucia Baratto; Kristina Elizabeth Hawk
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-30

6.  Whole-Body MRI Is an Effective Imaging Modality for Hematological Malignancy Treatment Response Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Guisen Lin; Xiaodan Zong; Yaowen Li; Weiting Tan; Weisheng Sun; Siqi Zhang; Yungen Gan; Hongwu Zeng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  An international expert opinion statement on the utility of PET/MR for imaging of skeletal metastases.

Authors:  Jad S Husseini; Bárbara Juarez Amorim; Angel Torrado-Carvajal; Vinay Prabhu; David Groshar; Lale Umutlu; Ken Herrmann; Lina García Cañamaque; José Ramón García Garzón; William E Palmer; Pedram Heidari; Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih; Jacob Sosna; Cristina Matushita; Juliano Cerci; Marcelo Queiroz; Valdair Francisco Muglia; Marcello H Nogueira-Barbosa; Ronald J H Borra; Thomas C Kwee; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Laura Evangelista; Marco Salvatore; Alberto Cuocolo; Andrea Soricelli; Christian Herold; Andrea Laghi; Marius Mayerhoefer; Umar Mahmood; Ciprian Catana; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Bruce Rosen; Onofrio A Catalano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Whole-body MRI versus an [18F]FDG-PET/CT-based reference standard for early response assessment and restaging of paediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma: a prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  Suzanne Spijkers; Annemieke S Littooij; Thomas C Kwee; Nelleke Tolboom; Auke Beishuizen; Marrie C A Bruin; Goya Enríquez; Constantino Sábado; Elka Miller; Claudio Granata; Charlotte de Lange; Federico Verzegnassi; Bart de Keizer; Rutger A J Nievelstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.