Literature DB >> 19350414

Aortic valves stenosis and regurgitation: assessment with dual source computed tomography.

Xiaofei Li1, Lijun Tang, Lei Zhou, Yuqing Duan, Sheng Yanhui, Rong Yang, Yanhu Wu, Xiangqing Kong.   

Abstract

To prospectively evaluate diagnostic accuracy of dual source computed tomography (DSCT) for evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS) and aortic regurgitation (AR) with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as reference. We evaluated a total of 79 patients who underwent both DSCT and TTE, 40 with aortic valve disease as assessed by TTE, and 39 matched controls. Maximum aortic valve area (AVA) in systole was planimetrically measured with DSCT, and measurements were compared with TTE, as well as maximum regurgitant orifice area (ROA) in diastole. Dimensions of the aortic root and left ventricular parameters were compared. DSCT correctly identified 30 patients with AS [sensitivity 91%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 94%], and 32 patients with AR (sensitivity 94%, specificity 98%, PPV 97%, and NPV 96%). A significant correlation was observed between CT planimetric size of aortic valves area and TTE (r = 0.79; P < 0.01). Bland-Altman plot demonstrates a good intermodality agreement between DSCT and TTE with a slight overestimation of AVA by DSCT (+0.14 cm(2)). A significant correlation was observed between CT planimetric size of ROA (0.49 cm(2) +/- 0.40) and TTE classification of mild, moderate and severe AR (r = 0.79; P < 0.01). With receiver operating characterisitic curve analysis, discrimination between degrees of AR with DSCT was not very accurate within cutoff ROAs. A significant correlation was observed between methods in dimensions of aortic annulus (r = 0.87, P < 0.01), sinus of Valsalva (r = 0.91, P < 0.01), and ascending aorta (r = 0.92, P < 0.01), and in end-systolic volume (r = 0.82, P< 0.01), end-diastolic volume (r = 0.87, P < 0.01) and ejection fraction (r = 0.86, P < 0.01). DSCT can provide a simultaneous and accurate evaluation of the AVA, left ventricular ejection fraction and aortic root dimensions in patients with AS or AR, but measurement of ROA is not very accurate to differentiate severity of AR. DSCT can achieve an exhaustive and comprehensive preoperative assessment of patients with AS and AR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19350414     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-009-9456-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  31 in total

1.  Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience.

Authors:  Kai Uwe Juergens; Matthias Grude; David Maintz; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Thomas Wichter; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; A Jamil Tajik
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Subha V Raman; Mona Shah; Beth McCarthy; Anne Garcia; Amy K Ferketich
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area.

Authors:  Gudrun M Feuchtner; Silvana Müller; Johannes Bonatti; Thomas Schachner; Corinna Velik-Salchner; Otmar Pachinger; Wolfgang Dichtl
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability.

Authors:  David Matt; Hans Scheffel; Sebastian Leschka; Thomas G Flohr; Borut Marincek; Philipp A Kaufmann; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Measurement of the aorta and its branches with helical CT.

Authors:  G D Rubin; D S Paik; P C Johnston; S Napel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Analysis of the effect of flow rate on the Doppler continuity equation for stenotic orifice area calculations: a numerical study.

Authors:  C G DeGroff; R Shandas; L Valdes-Cruz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-04-28       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description.

Authors:  Alain Cribier; Helene Eltchaninoff; Assaf Bash; Nicolas Borenstein; Christophe Tron; Fabrice Bauer; Genevieve Derumeaux; Frederic Anselme; François Laborde; Martin B Leon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-10       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease).

Authors:  R O Bonow; B Carabello; A C de Leon; L H Edmunds; B J Fedderly; M D Freed; W H Gaasch; C R McKay; R A Nishimura; P T O'Gara; R A O'Rourke; S H Rahimtoola; J L Ritchie; M D Cheitlin; K A Eagle; T J Gardner; A Garson; R J Gibbons; R O Russell; T J Ryan; S C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-11-03       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  W A Zoghbi; K L Farmer; J G Soto; J G Nelson; M A Quinones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  7 in total

1.  Measurement of the ascending aorta diameter in patients with severe bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis using dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Jee Young Son; Sung Min Ko; Jin Woo Choi; Meong Gun Song; Hweung Kon Hwang; Sook Jin Lee; Joon-Won Kang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Morphological assessment of the aortic valve using coronary computed tomography angiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with intraoperative findings.

Authors:  Seung Choul Lee; Sung Min Ko; Meong Gun Song; Je Kyoun Shin; Hyun Keun Chee; Hweung Kon Hwang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Aortic valve repair update.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Komiya
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-02-05

4.  Planimetric measurement of the regurgitant orifice area using multidetector CT for aortic regurgitation: a comparison with the use of echocardiography.

Authors:  Min Hee Jeon; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Soo Jin Cho; Seung Woo Park; Pyo Won Park; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 5.  Evaluation of the aortic and mitral valves with cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sung Min Ko; Meong Gun Song; Hweung Kon Hwang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Imaging of cardiac valves by computed tomography.

Authors:  Gudrun Feuchtner
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2013-12-29

7.  Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Quadricuspid Aortic Valves Using Cardiac Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Inyoung Song; Jung Ah Park; Bo Hwa Choi; Sung Min Ko; Je Kyoun Shin; Hyun Keun Chee; Jun Seok Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.500

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.