Literature DB >> 9593565

Analysis of the effect of flow rate on the Doppler continuity equation for stenotic orifice area calculations: a numerical study.

C G DeGroff1, R Shandas, L Valdes-Cruz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Flow-rate dependencies of the Doppler continuity equation are addressed in this study. METHODS AND
RESULTS: By use of computational fluid dynamic (CFD) software with turbulence modeling, three-dimensional axisymmetric models of round stenotic orifices were created. Flow simulations were run for various orifice area sizes (0.785, 1.13, 1.76, and 3.14 cm2) and flow rates (0.37 to 25.0 L/min). Reynolds numbers ranged from 100 to 8000. Once adequate convergence was obtained with each simulation, the location of the vena contracta was determined. For each run, maximum and average velocities across the cross section of the vena contracta were tabulated and vena contracta cross-sectional area (effective orifice area) determined. The difference between the maximum velocity and the average velocity at the vena contracta was smallest at high-flow states, with more of a difference at low-flow states. At lower-flow states, the velocity vector profile at the vena contracta was parabolic, whereas at high-flow states, the profile became more flattened. Also, the effective orifice area (vena contracta cross-sectional area) varied with flow rate. At moderate-flow states, the effective orifice area reached a minimum and expanded at low- and high-flow states, remaining relatively constant at high-flow states.
CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that significant differences exist between the maximum velocity and the average velocity at the vena contracta at low flow rates. A likely explanation for this is that viscous effects cause lower velocities at the edges of the vena contracta at low flow rates, resulting in a parabolic profile. At higher-flow states, inertial forces overcome viscous drag, causing a flatter profile. Effective orifice area itself varies with flow rate as well, with the smallest areas seen at moderate-flow states. These flow-dependent factors lead to flow rate-dependent errors in the Doppler continuity equation. Our results have strong relevance to clinical measurements of stenotic valve areas by use of the Doppler continuity equation under varying cardiac output conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9593565     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.97.16.1597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  10 in total

1.  Flow in the early embryonic human heart: a numerical study.

Authors:  C G DeGroff; B L Thornburg; J O Pentecost; K L Thornburg; M Gharib; D J Sahn; A Baptista
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 2.  Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis: value and limitations of dobutamine stress testing.

Authors:  J Bermejo; R Yotti
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Assessing aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by continuity equation: a novel approach using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  Kian Keong Poh; Robert A Levine; Jorge Solis; Liang Shen; Mary Flaherty; Yue-Jian Kang; J Luis Guerrero; Judy Hung
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Aortic valves stenosis and regurgitation: assessment with dual source computed tomography.

Authors:  Xiaofei Li; Lijun Tang; Lei Zhou; Yuqing Duan; Sheng Yanhui; Rong Yang; Yanhu Wu; Xiangqing Kong
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  The effects of hypertension on aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  J Bermejo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Hemodynamic Modeling of Surgically Repaired Coarctation of the Aorta.

Authors:  Laura J Olivieri; Diane A de Zélicourt; Christopher M Haggerty; Kanishka Ratnayaka; Russell R Cross; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.495

Review 7.  Echocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Stenosis - Normal Flow and Low Flow Scenarios.

Authors:  Ian G Burwash
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2014-12

8.  Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Stephen H Little; Kwan-Leung Chan; Ian G Burwash
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Coronary capillary blood flow in a rat model of congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Heather J Kagan; Varujan D Belekdanian; Jiqiu Chen; Peter Backeris; Nadjib Hammoudi; Irene C Turnbull; Kevin D Costa; Roger J Hajjar
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2017-10-19

10.  Revisiting the simplified bernoulli equation.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Heys; Nicole Holyoak; Anna M Calleja; Marek Belohlavek; Hari P Chaliki
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2010-07-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.