Literature DB >> 17579171

Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area.

Gudrun M Feuchtner1, Silvana Müller, Johannes Bonatti, Thomas Schachner, Corinna Velik-Salchner, Otmar Pachinger, Wolfgang Dichtl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate planimetry of the aortic valve area with 64-slice CT in comparison with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with aortic stenosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with aortic valve disease referred for coronary 64-slice CT angiography were examined. Planimetry of the aortic valve area with 64-slice CT was compared with TTE using the Doppler continuity equation for calculation of the aortic valve area and with planimetric measurement of the aortic valve area using TEE.
RESULTS: Planimetry of the aortic valve area with CT (1.11 +/- 0.42 cm2) showed a good correlation with TTE (1.05 +/- 0.42 cm2) (r = 0.88, p < 0.001) in 32 patients and a good correlation with TEE (1.41 +/- 1.61 cm2) (r = 0.99, p < 0.0001) in 10 patients. The mean and maximum transvalvular pressure gradients were correlated with the aortic valve area as measured with CT (r = -0.68, p = 0.0001; and r = -0.67, p = 0.0001, respectively). Beta-blockers were not given (mean heart rate, 62.5 +/- 10.7 beats per minute).
CONCLUSION: MDCT allows accurate planimetry of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis. In patients referred for 64-slice CT coronary angiography, concomitant aortic stenosis can be identified and evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17579171     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  20 in total

1.  The utility of computed tomography in the context of aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Gudrun M Feuchtner
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Aortic valves stenosis and regurgitation: assessment with dual source computed tomography.

Authors:  Xiaofei Li; Lijun Tang; Lei Zhou; Yuqing Duan; Sheng Yanhui; Rong Yang; Yanhu Wu; Xiangqing Kong
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Morphological assessment of the aortic valve using coronary computed tomography angiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with intraoperative findings.

Authors:  Seung Choul Lee; Sung Min Ko; Meong Gun Song; Je Kyoun Shin; Hyun Keun Chee; Hweung Kon Hwang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  [Investigation techniques and importance of CT for diagnostics of cardiac valvular diseases].

Authors:  S Gordic; H Alkadhi
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Aortic valve area assessed with 320-detector computed tomography: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Linnea Hornbech Larsen; Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed; Helle Gervig Carstensen; Mads Rams Mejdahl; Mads Jønsson Andersen; Jesper Kjaergaard; Olav Wendelboe Nielsen; Lars Køber; Rasmus Møgelvang; Christian Hassager
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Characteristics of aortic valve dysfunction and ascending aorta dimensions according to bicuspid aortic valve morphology.

Authors:  Hong Ju Shin; Je Kyoun Shin; Hyun Kun Chee; Jun Suk Kim; Sung Min Ko
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Geometrical characteristics of aortic root and left ventricular dysfunction in aortic stenosis: quantification of 256-slice coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Michinobu Nagao; Yuzo Yamasaki; Takeshi Kamitani; Satoshi Kawanami; Masatoshi Kondo; Hiromichi Sonoda; Taisuke Fujioka; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Aortic valve area: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of multi-detector computed tomography for aortic valve area measurements as compared to transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Rajnil G Shah; Gian M Novaro; Rodolfo J Blandon; Mitchell S Whiteman; Craig R Asher; Jacobo Kirsch
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) and Computed Tomography (CCT) in Facilitating Heart Failure Management.

Authors:  R Brandon Stacey; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-08

Review 10.  Aortic stenosis: evaluation with multidetector CT angiography and MR imaging.

Authors:  Eun Ju Chun; Sang Il Choi; Cheong Lim; Kye-Hyun Park; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Dong-Ju Choi; Dong Hun Kim; Whal Lee; Jae Hyung Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.