Literature DB >> 19350213

Impact of shock requiring norepinephrine on the accuracy and reliability of subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring.

Ulrike Holzinger1, Joanna Warszawska, Reinhard Kitzberger, Harald Herkner, Philipp G H Metnitz, Christian Madl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of circulatory shock requiring norepinephrine therapy on the accuracy and reliability of a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in critically ill patients. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A prospective, validation study of a medical intensive care unit at a university hospital was carried out.
METHODS: Continuous glucose monitoring was performed subcutaneously in 50 consecutive patients on intensive insulin therapy (IIT), who were assessed according to the a priori strata of circulatory shock requiring norepinephrine therapy or not.
RESULTS: A total of 736 pairs of sensor glucose (SG)/blood glucose (BG) values were analysed (502 without and 234 with norepinephrine therapy). For all values, repeated measures Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.08 mmol/l (limits of agreement: -1.26 and 1.43 mmol/l). Circulatory shock requiring norepinephrine therapy did not influence the relation of arterial BG with SG in a multivariable random effects linear regression analysis. The covariates norepinephrine dose, body mass index (BMI), glucose level and severity of illness also had no influence. Insulin titration grid analysis showed that 98.6% of the data points were in the acceptable treatment zone. No data were in the life-threatening zone.
CONCLUSIONS: Circulatory shock requiring norepinephrine therapy, as well as other covariates, had no influence on the accuracy and reliability of the CGMS in critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19350213     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1471-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  36 in total

1.  Performance of a continuous glucose monitoring system during controlled hypoglycaemia in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  E H Cheyne; D A Cavan; D Kerr
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Predisposing factors for hypoglycemia in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Titia M Vriesendorp; Susanne van Santen; J Hans DeVries; Evert de Jonge; Frits R Rosendaal; Marcus J Schultz; Joost B L Hoekstra
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 3.  Tight blood glucose control with insulin in the ICU: facts and controversies.

Authors:  Ilse Vanhorebeek; Lies Langouche; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Intensive insulin therapy in the intensive care unit: assessment by continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Christophe De Block; Begoña Manuel-Y-Keenoy; Luc Van Gaal; Peter Rogiers
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Clinical evaluation of alternative-site glucose measurements in patients after major cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Martin Ellmerer; Martin Haluzik; Jan Blaha; Jaromir Kremen; Stepan Svacina; Wolfgang Toller; Julia Mader; Lukas Schaupp; Johannes Plank; Thomas Pieber
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Closed-loop glucose control in critically ill patients using continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in real time.

Authors:  Frederick Chee; Tyrone Fernando; P Vernon van Heerden
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2003-03

7.  Failure to achieve glycemic control despite intensive insulin therapy in a medical ICU: incidence and influence on ICU mortality.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Lacherade; Patricia Jabre; Sylvie Bastuji-Garin; David Grimaldi; Pascal Fangio; Valerie Théron; Hervé Outin; Bernard De Jonghe
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Association between hyperglycemia and increased hospital mortality in a heterogeneous population of critically ill patients.

Authors:  James Stephen Krinsley
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Effect of an intensive glucose management protocol on the mortality of critically ill adult patients.

Authors:  James Stephen Krinsley
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Benefits and risks of tight glucose control in critically ill adults: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Daniel C Wiener; Robin J Larson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  43 in total

1.  Multicenter Observational Study of the First-Generation Intravenous Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Grant V Bochicchio; Brian R Hipszer; Michelle F Magee; Richard M Bergenstal; Anthony P Furnary; Angela M Gulino; Michael J Higgins; Peter C Simpson; Jeffrey I Joseph
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-01

2.  Consensus Statement on Inpatient Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Amisha Wallia; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Robert J Rushakoff; David C Klonoff; Daniel J Rubin; Sherita Hill Golden; Curtiss B Cook; Bithika Thompson
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-21

Review 3.  Continuous glucose monitoring in insulin-treated patients in non-ICU settings.

Authors:  Ana Maria Gomez; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-08-13

4.  The effect of congestive heart failure on sensor accuracy among hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Kathleen Dungan; Kari Graessle; Colleen Sagrilla
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Insulin-Based Infusion System: Advancing the Development.

Authors:  Nasseh Hashemi; Tim Valk; Kim Houlind; Niels Ejskjaer
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-10

6.  Subcutaneous glucose measurements and glucose regulation (?).

Authors:  Jack J Ligtenberg; Hella F Borggreve; Arjanne Stemerdink; Jan G Zijlstra
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2009: I. Pneumonia and infections, sepsis, outcome, acute renal failure and acid base, nutrition and glycaemic control.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  [Glucose control in the critically ill. Innovations and contemporary strategies].

Authors:  U Holzinger
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 0.840

9.  Continuous Glucose Monitors and Automated Insulin Dosing Systems in the Hospital Consensus Guideline.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Galindo; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Robert J Rushakoff; Ananda Basu; Suzanne Lohnes; James H Nichols; Elias K Spanakis; Juan Espinoza; Nadine E Palermo; Dessa Garnett Awadjie; Leigh Bak; Bruce Buckingham; Curtiss B Cook; Guido Freckmann; Lutz Heinemann; Roman Hovorka; Nestoras Mathioudakis; Tonya Newman; David N O'Neal; Michaela Rickert; David B Sacks; Jane Jeffrie Seley; Amisha Wallia; Trisha Shang; Jennifer Y Zhang; Julia Han; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-28

10.  Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Ulrike Holzinger; Joanna Warszawska; Reinhard Kitzberger; Marlene Wewalka; Wolfgang Miehsler; Harald Herkner; Christian Madl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.