Literature DB >> 16873775

Intensive insulin therapy in the intensive care unit: assessment by continuous glucose monitoring.

Christophe De Block1, Begoña Manuel-Y-Keenoy, Luc Van Gaal, Peter Rogiers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Hyperglycemia occurs in most critically ill patients. Using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), we investigated whether intensive insulin therapy based on discontinuous glucose monitoring can achieve normoglycemia (80-110 mg/dl) in a medical intensive care unit (MICU). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty adults (men/women 31/19, age 62 +/- 16 years, nondiabetic/diabetic 30/20, intravenous/subcutaneous insulin 22/28, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 22 +/- 7) were prospectively recruited. Forty-eight-hour CGM was performed using a subcutaneous glucose sensor (GlucoDay) and compared with arterial glycemia. Main outcome measures were percent of time in normoglycemia and accuracy/applicability of CGM.
RESULTS: During 48-h CGM, glycemia reached target (80-110 mg/dl) in only 22 +/- 18%, was >140 mg/dl in 39 +/- 27%, and was <60 mg/dl in 5 +/- 10% of the time. Patients on subcutaneous versus intravenous insulin had more glycemia readings >110 mg/dl (P = 0.016). Glycemia was higher in diabetic patients (170 +/- 77 vs. 129 +/- 35 mg/dl, P = 0.013). BMI was an independent determinant for bad glycemic control (beta = 0.73, P < 0.0001). Diabetic state (beta = 0.47, P < 0.0001), septic shock (beta = 0.22, P = 0.045), sequential organ failure assessment score (beta = 0.40, P = 0.001), and use of corticoids (beta = 0.28, P = 0.014) and inotropics (beta = -0.24, P = 0.035) were independent determinants of insulin dose. GlucoDay values and arterial glycemia correlated well (r = 0.85, P < 0.0001, n = 555 after six-point calibration), with 97% of data falling in regions A and B of error grid analysis. There were no adverse events using GlucoDay.
CONCLUSIONS: GlucoDay, a well-tolerated 48-h CGM system, revealed that normoglycemia was only achieved 22% of the time in MICU patients. Further studies should investigate whether application of CGM to titrate insulin therapy can improve patient outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16873775     DOI: 10.2337/dc05-2353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  45 in total

1.  Evaluating the clinical accuracy of GlucoMen®Day: a novel microdialysis-based continuous glucose monitor.

Authors:  Francesco Valgimigli; Fausto Lucarelli; Cosimo Scuffi; Sara Morandi; Iolanda Sposato
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

2.  Impact of shock requiring norepinephrine on the accuracy and reliability of subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Ulrike Holzinger; Joanna Warszawska; Reinhard Kitzberger; Harald Herkner; Philipp G H Metnitz; Christian Madl
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Effects of blood glucose transcription mismatches on a computer-based intensive insulin therapy protocol.

Authors:  Thomas R Campion; Addison K May; Lemuel R Waitman; Asli Ozdas; Cynthia S Gadd
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Numerical and clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system during intravenous insulin therapy in the surgical and burn intensive care units.

Authors:  Atoosa Rabiee; Virginia Andreasik; Rania Abu-Hamdah; Panagis Galiatsatos; Zeina Khouri; B Robert Gibson; Dana K Andersen; Dariush Elahi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

5.  Technology to treat hyperglycemia in trauma.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03

6.  Consensus Statement on Inpatient Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Amisha Wallia; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Robert J Rushakoff; David C Klonoff; Daniel J Rubin; Sherita Hill Golden; Curtiss B Cook; Bithika Thompson
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-21

7.  Accuracy and reliability of a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring device in critically ill patients.

Authors:  S Rijkenberg; S C van Steen; J H DeVries; P H J van der Voort
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  GlucoMen Day continuous glucose monitoring system: a screening for enzymatic and electrochemical interferents.

Authors:  Fausto Lucarelli; Francesco Ricci; Felice Caprio; Francesco Valgimigli; Cosimo Scuffi; Danila Moscone; Giuseppe Palleschi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

9.  Clinical evaluation of subcutaneous lactate measurement in patients after major cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Martin Ellmerer; Martin Haluzik; Jan Blaha; Jaromir Kremen; Stepan Svacina; Andreas Plasnik; Dimas Ikeoka; Manfred Bodenlenz; Lukas Schaupp; Johannes Plank; Thomas R Pieber
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.257

10.  Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Ulrike Holzinger; Joanna Warszawska; Reinhard Kitzberger; Marlene Wewalka; Wolfgang Miehsler; Harald Herkner; Christian Madl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.