Literature DB >> 19338030

Implications of noise and resolution on mechanical properties of trabecular bone estimated by image-based finite-element analysis.

Chamith S Rajapakse1, Jeremy Magland, X Henry Zhang, X Sherry Liu, Suzanne L Wehrli, X Edward Guo, Felix W Wehrli.   

Abstract

Recent advances in micro-magnetic resonance imaging (microMRI) now allow noninvasive assessment of mechanical properties of trabecular bone (TB) in vivo by micro finite-element analysis. The first aim of this work was to address the implications of limited resolution and signal-to-noise ratio on elastic properties of TB derived under conditions of in vivo imaging via simulation at various resolutions and noise levels on the basis of models derived from microCT images at 21 microm isotropic voxel size from cores of cadaveric human TB (n = 13) from three anatomic sites. The second aim was to compare how elastic constants derived from actual MR images at 9.4 Tesla at 50 microm isotropic voxel size compare with those from high-resolution microCT. Elastic moduli computed from simulated in vivo microMR images were highly correlated with those obtained from microCT (R(2) = 0.99) and the data were relatively immune to noise. Correlations of similar strength were obtained between estimated moduli from microCT and acquired high-field MR images. Systematic errors manifesting in significant deviations of the slopes from unity are caused by higher apparent bone-volume fraction of the MR images but can potentially be corrected with appropriate histogram-standardization techniques. (c) 2009 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19338030      PMCID: PMC2748132          DOI: 10.1002/jor.20877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  37 in total

1.  Bone turnover matters: the raloxifene treatment paradox of dramatic decreases in vertebral fractures without commensurate increases in bone density.

Authors:  B Lawrence Riggs; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Volume mesh generation and finite element analysis of trabecular bone magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Angel Alberich-Bayarri; David Moratal; Luis Martí-Bonmatí; Manuel Salmerón-Sánchez; Ana Vallés-Lluch; Laura Nieto-Charques; José J Rieta
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

3.  Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: magnetic susceptibility of bone.

Authors:  J A Hopkins; F W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Numerical errors and uncertainties in finite-element modeling of trabecular bone.

Authors:  A J Ladd; J H Kinney
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Direct mechanics assessment of elastic symmetries and properties of trabecular bone architecture.

Authors:  B Van Rietbergen; A Odgaard; J Kabel; R Huiskes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Stephanie Boutroy; Mary L Bouxsein; Francoise Munoz; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Quantitative analysis of trabecular microstructure by 400 MHz nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  H W Chung; F W Wehrli; J L Williams; S D Kugelmass; S L Wehrli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  A homogenization sampling procedure for calculating trabecular bone effective stiffness and tissue level stress.

Authors:  S J Hollister; J M Brennan; N Kikuchi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains.

Authors:  T M Keaveny; X E Guo; E F Wachtel; T A McMahon; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Bone structure of the distal radius and the calcaneus vs BMD of the spine and proximal femur in the prediction of osteoporotic spine fractures.

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Volker Vieth; Julia Matheis; David Newitt; Ying Lu; Ernst J Rummeny; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  21 in total

1.  In vivo estimation of bone stiffness at the distal femur and proximal tibia using ultra-high-field 7-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and micro-finite element analysis.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Chamith S Rajapakse; James S Babb; Stephen P Honig; Michael P Recht; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Radiological diagnostic progress in skeletal diseases.

Authors:  Giuseppe Guglielmi; Michelangelo Nasuto; Michele La Porta
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2011-01

3.  Structural and mechanical parameters of trabecular bone estimated from in vivo high-resolution magnetic resonance images at 3 tesla field strength.

Authors:  Michael Jeffrey Wald; Jeremy Franklin Magland; Chamith Sudesh Rajapakse; Felix Werner Wehrli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Finite element analysis applied to 3-T MR imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture: lower bone strength in patients with fragility fractures compared with control subjects.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig; Ryan Brown; Cem M Deniz; Kenneth A Egol; James S Babb; Ravinder R Regatte; Chamith S Rajapakse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 6.  Micro-Finite Element Analysis of the Proximal Femur on the Basis of High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  MRI-based assessment of proximal femur strength compared to mechanical testing.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Alexander R Farid; Daniel C Kargilis; Brandon C Jones; Jae S Lee; Alyssa J Johncola; Alexandra S Batzdorf; Snehal S Shetye; Michael W Hast; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Bone loss at the distal femur and proximal tibia in persons with spinal cord injury: imaging approaches, risk of fracture, and potential treatment options.

Authors:  C M Cirnigliaro; M J Myslinski; M F La Fountaine; S C Kirshblum; G F Forrest; W A Bauman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Computational biomechanics of the distal tibia from high-resolution MR and micro-CT images.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Jeremy F Magland; Michael J Wald; X Sherry Liu; X Henry Zhang; X Edward Guo; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Micro-finite element analysis applied to high-resolution MRI reveals improved bone mechanical competence in the distal femur of female pre-professional dancers.

Authors:  G Chang; C S Rajapakse; M Diamond; S Honig; M P Recht; D S Weiss; R R Regatte
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.