Literature DB >> 10390684

Can the written information to research subjects be improved?--an empirical study.

E Bjørn1, P Rossel, S Holm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study whether linguistic analysis and changes in information leaflets can improve readability and understanding.
DESIGN: Randomised, controlled study. Two information leaflets concerned with trials of drugs for conditions/diseases which are commonly known were modified, and the original was tested against the revised version.
SETTING: Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: 235 persons in the relevant age groups. MAIN MEASURES: Readability and understanding of contents.
RESULTS: Both readability and understanding of contents was improved: readability with regard to both information leaflets and understanding with regard to one of the leaflets.
CONCLUSION: The results show that both readability and understanding can be improved by increased attention to the linguistic features of the information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10390684      PMCID: PMC479221          DOI: 10.1136/jme.25.3.263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  14 in total

1.  Some overlooked aspects of consent form readability.

Authors:  Mark Hochhauser
Journal:  IRB       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

2.  Evaluating the readability of informed consent forms used in contraceptive clinical trials.

Authors:  R Rivera; J S Reed; D Menius
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.561

3.  Institutional Review Board (IRB) review lacks impact on the readability of consent forms for research.

Authors:  D E Hammerschmidt; M A Keane
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.378

4.  Are patient consent forms for research protocols easy to read?

Authors:  K A Priestley; C Campbell; C B Valentine; D M Denison; N P Buller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-21

5.  Empirical studies of ethical issues in research. A research agenda.

Authors:  B Stanley; J E Sieber; G B Melton
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1987-07

6.  Ethical problems in clinical research: the need for empirical studies of the clinical trials process.

Authors:  W J Mackillop; P A Johnston
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

7.  Readability of informed consent forms for use with iodinated contrast media.

Authors:  K D Hopper; H A Lambe; S J Shirk
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms.

Authors:  K J Tarnowski; D M Allen; C Mayhall; P A Kelly
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Informed consent in European multicentre randomised clinical trials--are patients really informed?

Authors:  C J Williams; M Zwitter
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  [Written patient information. Analysis of Danish biomedical research programs].

Authors:  S Holm
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1992-08-31
View more
  28 in total

1.  Empirical medical ethics.

Authors:  T Hope
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Correlates of lower comprehension of informed consent among participants enrolled in a cohort study in Pune, India.

Authors:  Neelam S Joglekar; Swapna S Deshpande; Seema Sahay; Manisha V Ghate; Robert C Bollinger; Sanjay M Mehendale
Journal:  Int Health       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 2.473

3.  Informing children and parents about research.

Authors:  A Dawson; S A Spencer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Length and complexity of US and international HIV consent forms from federal HIV network trials.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Lelia Chaisson; Holly A Taylor; Jennifer Lohse
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Using a brief intervention to improve decisional capacity in schizophrenia research.

Authors:  David J Moser; Rebecca L Reese; Clare T Hey; Susan K Schultz; Stephan Arndt; Leigh J Beglinger; Kevin M Duff; Nancy C Andreasen
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Rebecca L Sudore; C Seth Landefeld; Brie A Williams; Deborah E Barnes; Karla Lindquist; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Parent ratings of ability to consent for clinical trials in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Donald B Bailey; Melissa Raspa; Anne Wheeler; Anne Edwards; Ellen Bishop; Carla Bann; David Borasky; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Enhancing patient understanding of medical procedures: evaluation of an interactive multimedia program with in-line exercises.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Stanley J Chetcuti; Colleen Brennan-Martinez; Robert Levine
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 9.  The doctor's duty to the elderly patient in clinical trials.

Authors:  Antony Bayer; Mark Fish
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Informing the uninformed: optimizing the consent message using a fractional factorial design.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Vijayan N Nair; Naveen N Narisetty; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 16.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.