Literature DB >> 10158765

Informed consent in clinical trials.

F W Verheggen1, F C van Wijmen.   

Abstract

A review is provided in this paper on the empirical literature on informed consent from 1979 to 1995 referring to information disclosure and trial participation in clinical trials. Articles being reviewed focus upon information disclosure, reactions to disclosure and recall, features of consent and perceptions of informed consent, both in hypothetical and in real life situations. It is concluded that further research is needed to study the process of informed consent in clinical trials, to obtain a better insight into the myth and reality of informed consent in daily practice. Future studies should come forward on the limitations of previous empirical research on informed consent. Additional research should focus on the perspectives of patients who accept or decline trial participation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10158765     DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)00805-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  16 in total

Review 1.  Ethical issues in the development of new agents.

Authors:  C K Daugherty
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  The quality of informed consent: mapping the landscape. A review of empirical data from developing and developed countries.

Authors:  Amulya Mandava; Christine Pace; Benjamin Campbell; Ezekiel Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Do undergraduate student research participants read psychological research consent forms? Examining memory effects, condition effects, and individual differences.

Authors:  Eric R Pedersen; Clayton Neighbors; Judy Tidwell; Ty Lostutter
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2011-07-14

4.  A randomized controlled trial of an electronic informed consent process.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Bob Wong; Nancy C Rose; Rebecca Anderson; Beth Fedor; Louisa A Stark; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Corrected Feedback: A Procedure to Enhance Recall of Informed Consent to Research among Substance Abusing Offenders.

Authors:  David S Festinger; Karen L Dugosh; Jason R Croft; Patricia L Arabia; Douglas B Marlowe
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2010-01-01

6.  Informed Assent Recall Among Adolescents in Substance Use Disorder Treatment Research.

Authors:  Jordan P Davis; Emily A Lux; Douglas C Smith; Leah Cleeland
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse       Date:  2016-05-04

7.  Achieving new levels of recall in consent to research by combining remedial and motivational techniques.

Authors:  David S Festinger; Karen L Dugosh; Douglas B Marlowe; Nicolle T Clements
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Multimedia consent for research in people with schizophrenia and normal subjects: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dilip V Jeste; Barton W Palmer; Shahrokh Golshan; Lisa T Eyler; Laura B Dunn; Thomas Meeks; Danielle Glorioso; Ian Fellows; Helena Kraemer; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Monetary incentives improve recall of research consent information: it pays to remember.

Authors:  David S Festinger; Douglas B Marlowe; Jason R Croft; Karen L Dugosh; Patricia L Arabia; Kathleen M Benasutti
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Improving understanding of clinical trial procedures among low literacy populations: an intervention within a microbicide trial in Malawi.

Authors:  Paul M Ndebele; Douglas Wassenaar; Esther Munalula; Francis Masiye
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.