Literature DB >> 19321970

Does study design influence outcome?. The effects of placebo control and treatment duration in antidepressant trials.

Bret R Rutherford1, Joel R Sneed, Steven P Roose.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinicians and researchers synthesize data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antidepressants to make conclusions about the efficacy of medications for depression. All treatments include nonspecific factors in addition to the specific effects of drugs, and study design may influence patient outcomes via nonspecific factors. This study investigated whether placebo control and treatment duration affect the outcome in antidepressant RCTs.
METHODS: Medline and the Cochrane Database were searched to identify RCTs of antidepressants for major depression approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Included studies enrolled outpatient participants aged 18-65, lasted 6-12 weeks, compared an antidepressant to placebo or another antidepressant and were published in English after 1985. Excluded trials enrolled inpatients, pregnant women and subjects with psychosis or mania. Mixed-effects logistic regression models including study type (placebo-controlled or comparator) and study duration (6, 8 or 12 weeks) as fixed effects determined whether these factors affected response and remission rates.
RESULTS: In the 90 trials analyzed, the odds of depression response (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.45-2.17, p < 0.001) and remission (OR 1.53, 95% CI = 1.11-2.11, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in comparator relative to placebo-controlled trials. Trials lasting 8 (OR = 1.37, CI = 1.14-1.64, p = 0.001) and 12 (OR = 1.52, CI = 1.12-2.07, p = 0.008) weeks had significantly greater response rates than 6-week trials without differing themselves.
CONCLUSIONS: Response and remission rates to antidepressants are significantly affected by study type and duration. Clinicians and researchers must consider the study design when interpreting and designing RCTs of antidepressant medications. Copyright (c) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19321970      PMCID: PMC3785090          DOI: 10.1159/000209348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychother Psychosom        ISSN: 0033-3190            Impact factor:   17.659


  101 in total

1.  A rating scale for depression.

Authors:  M HAMILTON
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1960-02       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) in outpatients with major depression. The Venlafaxine XR 209 Study Group.

Authors:  M E Thase
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.384

3.  A placebo-controlled comparison of the antidepressant efficacy and effects on sexual functioning of sustained-release bupropion and sertraline.

Authors:  H Croft; E Settle; T Houser; S R Batey; R M Donahue; J A Ascher
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.393

4.  The use of venlafaxine in the treatment of major depression and major depression associated with anxiety: a dose-response study. Venlafaxine Investigator Study Group.

Authors:  A Khan; G V Upton; R L Rudolph; R Entsuah; S M Leventer
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.153

5.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the effects of sertraline versus amitriptyline in the treatment of major depression.

Authors:  R B Lydiard; S M Stahl; M Hertzman; W M Harrison
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.384

6.  A Canadian multicenter, double-blind study of paroxetine and fluoxetine in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  G Chouinard; B Saxena; M C Bélanger; A Ravindran; D Bakish; L Beauclair; P Morris; N P Vasavan Nair; R Manchanda; R Reesal; R Remick; M C O'Neill
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  Duloxetine in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael J Detke; Curtis G Wiltse; Craig H Mallinckrodt; Robert K McNamara; Mark A Demitrack; Istvan Bitter
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.600

8.  Once-daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) and venlafaxine immediate release (IR) in outpatients with major depression. Venlafaxine XR 208 Study Group.

Authors:  L A Cunningham
Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.567

9.  Randomized, double-blind comparison of venlafaxine and fluoxetine in outpatients with major depression.

Authors:  J Costa e Silva
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.384

10.  A double-blind study of paroxetine, fluoxetine, and placebo in outpatients with major depression.

Authors:  M Fava; J D Amsterdam; J A Deltito; C Salzman; M Schwaller; D L Dunner
Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.567

View more
  56 in total

1.  Are the colors and shapes of current psychotropics designed to maximize the placebo response?

Authors:  Arif Khan; Eswara Prasad Bomminayuni; Amritha Bhat; James Faucett; Walter A Brown
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Clinical trial methodology and drug-placebo differences.

Authors:  Irving Kirsch
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Treatment of premenstrual dysphoria with continuous versus intermittent dosing of oral contraceptives: Results of a three-arm randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tory A Eisenlohr-Moul; Susan S Girdler; Jacqueline L Johnson; Peter J Schmidt; David R Rubinow
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 6.505

4.  Improving study design for antidepressant effectiveness assessment.

Authors:  Florian Naudet; Bruno Millet; Jean Michel Reymann; Bruno Falissard
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Clinic visits in late-life depression trials: effects on signal detection and therapeutic outcome.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Jane Tandler; Patrick J Brown; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 6.  [Placebo response: in studies on pain and under other clinical conditions].

Authors:  K Weimer; B Horing; S Klosterhalfen; P Enck
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 7.  Deconstructing pediatric depression trials: an analysis of the effects of expectancy and therapeutic contact.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Joel R Sneed; Jane M Tandler; David Rindskopf; Bradley S Peterson; Steven P Roose
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 8.829

Review 8.  The placebo response in clinical trials: more questions than answers.

Authors:  Paul Enck; Sibylle Klosterhalfen; Katja Weimer; Björn Horing; Stephan Zipfel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Expectancy and the Treatment of Depression: A Review of Experimental Methodology and Effects on Patient Outcome.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Tor D Wager; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rev       Date:  2010-02-01

10.  Study design affects participant expectations: a survey.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Scott Alan Rose; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.