Literature DB >> 15589385

Duloxetine in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial.

Michael J Detke1, Curtis G Wiltse, Craig H Mallinckrodt, Robert K McNamara, Mark A Demitrack, Istvan Bitter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Duloxetine is a balanced and potent dual reuptake inhibitor of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) that has previously been shown to be effective in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). This placebo-controlled study assesses the safety and efficacy of duloxetine (80 or 120 mg/day) and paroxetine (20 mg QD) during an initial 8-week acute phase and subsequent 6-month continuation phase treatment of MDD.
METHOD: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adult outpatients (age >or= 18 years) meeting DSM-IV criteria for MDD received placebo (n = 93), duloxetine 80 mg/day (40 mg BID; n = 95), duloxetine 120 mg/day (60 mg BID; n = 93), or paroxetine (20 mg QD; n = 86) for 8 weeks. Patients who had a >or= 30% reduction from baseline in HAMD(17) total score during the acute phase were allowed to continue on the same (blinded) treatment for a 6-month continuation phase. Efficacy measures included the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD(17)) total score, HAMD(17) subscales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for pain, the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scales, the 28-item Somatic Symptom Inventory (SSI), and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Safety and tolerability were assessed using treatment-emergent adverse events, discontinuations due to adverse events, vital signs, ECGs, laboratory tests, and the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX).
RESULTS: During the acute phase, patients receiving duloxetine 80 mg/day, duloxetine 120 mg/day, or paroxetine 20 mg QD had significantly greater reductions in HAMD(17) total score compared with placebo. Both duloxetine (80 and 120 mg/day) and paroxetine treatment groups had significantly greater improvement, compared with placebo, in MADRS, HAMA, CGI-S, and PGI-I scales. Estimated probabilities of remission at week 8 for patients receiving duloxetine 80 mg/day (51%), duloxetine 120 mg/day (58%), and paroxetine (47%) were significantly greater compared with those receiving placebo (30%). The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events among duloxetine-treated patients (80 and 120 mg/day) did not differ significantly from the rate in the placebo group. Treatment-emergent adverse events reported significantly more frequently by duloxetine-treated patients than by patients receiving placebo were constipation (80 and 120 mg/day), increased sweating (120 mg/day), and somnolence (120 mg/day). The incidence of acute treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction in duloxetine- and paroxetine-treated patients was 46.5% and 62.8%, respectively. During the 6-month continuation phase, duloxetine (80 and 120 mg/day) and paroxetine treatment groups demonstrated significant improvement in HAMD(17) total score. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring most frequently in each active treatment group during the continuation phase were viral infection (duloxetine 80 mg/day), diarrhea (duloxetine 120 mg/day), and headache (paroxetine 20 mg QD).
CONCLUSION: These data support previous findings that duloxetine is safe, efficacious, and well tolerated in the acute treatment of MDD. Furthermore, these data provide the first demonstration under double-blind, placebo-controlled conditions that the efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine are maintained during chronic treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15589385     DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol        ISSN: 0924-977X            Impact factor:   4.600


  58 in total

Review 1.  Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: thirty-year meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Juan Undurraga; Ross J Baldessarini
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Trajectories of depression severity in clinical trials of duloxetine: insights into antidepressant and placebo responses.

Authors:  Ralitza Gueorguieva; Craig Mallinckrodt; John H Krystal
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2011-12

Review 3.  The association between conventional antidepressants and the metabolic syndrome: a review of the evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Roger S McIntyre; Ka Young Park; Candy W Y Law; Farah Sultan; Amanda Adams; Maria Teresa Lourenco; Aaron K S Lo; Joanna K Soczynska; Hanna Woldeyohannes; Mohammad Alsuwaidan; Jinju Yoon; Sidney H Kennedy
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 4.  How should primary care doctors select which antidepressants to administer?

Authors:  Gerald Gartlehner; Kylie Thaler; Seth Hill; Richard A Hansen
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 5.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Dose-Response Relationship of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Ewgeni Jakubovski; Anjali L Varigonda; Nicholas Freemantle; Matthew J Taylor; Michael H Bloch
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of duloxetine following oral administration to healthy Chinese subjects.

Authors:  Si Tianmei; Mary Pat Knadler; Ming T Lim; Kwee Poo Yeo; Leyan Teng; Shu Liang; Alan X Pan; Evelyn D Lobo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Duloxetine: a review of its use in the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  An evaluation of the cardiovascular safety profile of duloxetine: findings from 42 placebo-controlled studies.

Authors:  Joachim Wernicke; Alberto Lledó; Joel Raskin; Daniel K Kajdasz; Fujun Wang
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for unipolar depression: a systematic review of classic long-term randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Dorian Deshauer; David Moher; Dean Fergusson; Ester Moher; Margaret Sampson; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Controlling for drug dose in systematic review and meta-analysis: a case study of the effect of antidepressant dose.

Authors:  Richard A Hansen; Charity G Moore; Stacie B Dusetzina; Brian I Leinwand; Gerald Gartlehner; Bradley N Gaynes
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.