Literature DB >> 10363731

A placebo-controlled comparison of the antidepressant efficacy and effects on sexual functioning of sustained-release bupropion and sertraline.

H Croft1, E Settle, T Houser, S R Batey, R M Donahue, J A Ascher.   

Abstract

Sexual dysfunction, a frequently reported side effect of many antidepressants, may result in patient dissatisfaction and noncompliance with treatment regimens. This paper describes the results of the first placebo-controlled comparison of the efficacy, safety, and effects on sexual functioning of sustained-release bupropion (bupropion SR) and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline. This randomized, double-masked, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter trial enrolled 360 patients with moderate-to-severe recurrent major depression. Patients were treated with bupropion SR 150 to 400 mg/d, sertraline 50 to 200 mg/d, or placebo for up to 8 weeks. Patients' depression and sexual functioning were assessed at weekly or biweekly clinic visits; safety was assessed by regular monitoring of adverse events, vital signs, and body weight. Treatment groups were similar at baseline in terms of age, sex, and race, and most patients had a diagnosis of moderate uncomplicated depression. Patients treated with bupropion SR or sertraline showed similar improvements on all efficacy measures; both active treatments were superior to placebo in improving scores on all rating scales for depression at various time points. Significantly more patients treated with sertraline experienced orgasmic dysfunction throughout the study than did patients treated with bupropion SR or placebo (P < 0.001). Headache was the most frequently reported adverse event in all 3 treatment groups and occurred with similar frequency in each group (30% to 40%). Nausea (31%), diarrhea (26%), insomnia (18%), and somnolence (17%) occurred in significantly more patients in the sertraline group than in the bupropion SR group (18%, 7%, 13%, and 3%, respectively) and the placebo group (10%, 11%, 4%, and 6%, respectively). Dry mouth occurred more frequently with bupropion SR (19%) than with sertraline (14%) or placebo (12%), although the differences were not significant. Changes in vital signs were similar in all groups. Similar (small, but not statistically significant) decreases in mean body weight were seen in both the bupropion SR (-1.06 kg) and sertraline (-0.79 kg) groups, whereas the placebo group experienced a minor increase (0.21 kg). Although bupropion SR and sertraline were similarly well tolerated and effective in the treatment of depression, sertraline treatment was more often associated with sexual dysfunction and certain other adverse events compared with bupropion SR and placebo. Therefore, bupropion SR may be an appropriate choice as an antidepressant for the treatment of sexually active patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10363731     DOI: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88317-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  45 in total

Review 1.  Sexual side effects of antidepressant drugs.

Authors:  A J Gelenberg; P Delgado; H G Nurnberg
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 2.  Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: thirty-year meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Juan Undurraga; Ross J Baldessarini
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  The Many Uses of Bupropion and Bupropion Sustained Release (SR) in Adults.

Authors:  Timothy R. Berigan
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2002-02

4.  Effect of Bupropion SR on the Quality of Life of Elderly Depressed Patients With Comorbid Medical Disorders.

Authors:  Molly R. Fortner; Kristine Brown; Indu M. Varia; Kenneth R. Gersing; Christopher O'Connor; P Murali Doraiswamy
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1999-12

Review 5.  The association between conventional antidepressants and the metabolic syndrome: a review of the evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Roger S McIntyre; Ka Young Park; Candy W Y Law; Farah Sultan; Amanda Adams; Maria Teresa Lourenco; Aaron K S Lo; Joanna K Soczynska; Hanna Woldeyohannes; Mohammad Alsuwaidan; Jinju Yoon; Sidney H Kennedy
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 6.  Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: lessons from translational neuroscience.

Authors:  Michael T Treadway; David H Zald
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 7.  How should primary care doctors select which antidepressants to administer?

Authors:  Gerald Gartlehner; Kylie Thaler; Seth Hill; Richard A Hansen
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 8.  Problems in the Descriptions of the Psychiatric Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria in Publications of Antidepressant Efficacy Trials: A Qualitative Review and Recommendations for Improved Clarity.

Authors:  Mark Zimmerman; Matthew Multach; Emily Walsh; Lia K Rosenstein; Douglas Gazarian; Heather L Clark
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.749

9.  Does study design influence outcome?. The effects of placebo control and treatment duration in antidepressant trials.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 17.659

10.  A novel approach for predicting antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction in rats.

Authors:  Stacey J Sukoff Rizzo; Lee E Schechter; Sharon Rosenzweig-Lipson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-09-16       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.