M E Thase1. 1. University of Pittsburgh, WPIC, PA 15213, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the efficacy and safety of once-daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) in out-patients with DSM-IV major depression. METHOD: Patients were randomly assigned to venlafaxine XR (75-225 mg) once daily or placebo for up to 8 weeks. The primary efficacy variables were the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total score and HAM-D depressed mood item, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores, and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Severity scale. Data were analyzed on a modified intent-to-treat basis using the last-observation-carried-forward method. RESULTS:Venlafaxine XR (N = 91) was significantly more effective than placebo (N = 100) beginning at Week 2 on the CGI Severity scale, at Week 3 on the HAM-D depressed mood item, and at Week 4 on the HAM-D and MADRS; this superiority was maintained through Week 8. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events associated with venlafaxine XR were nausea, insomnia, and somnolence. The incidence of nausea was highest during the first week, decreased by 50% during the second week, and was comparable to that of placebo from Week 3 onward. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that venlafaxine XR is an effective and well-tolerated treatment of major depression.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the efficacy and safety of once-daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) in out-patients with DSM-IV major depression. METHOD:Patients were randomly assigned to venlafaxine XR (75-225 mg) once daily or placebo for up to 8 weeks. The primary efficacy variables were the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total score and HAM-D depressed mood item, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores, and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Severity scale. Data were analyzed on a modified intent-to-treat basis using the last-observation-carried-forward method. RESULTS:Venlafaxine XR (N = 91) was significantly more effective than placebo (N = 100) beginning at Week 2 on the CGI Severity scale, at Week 3 on the HAM-D depressed mood item, and at Week 4 on the HAM-D and MADRS; this superiority was maintained through Week 8. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events associated with venlafaxine XR were nausea, insomnia, and somnolence. The incidence of nausea was highest during the first week, decreased by 50% during the second week, and was comparable to that of placebo from Week 3 onward. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that venlafaxine XR is an effective and well-tolerated treatment of major depression.
Authors: Ursula Reichenpfader; Gerald Gartlehner; Laura C Morgan; Amy Greenblatt; Barbara Nussbaumer; Richard A Hansen; Megan Van Noord; Linda Lux; Bradley N Gaynes Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Barbara Nussbaumer; Laura C Morgan; Ursula Reichenpfader; Amy Greenblatt; Richard A Hansen; Megan Van Noord; Linda Lux; Bradley N Gaynes; Gerald Gartlehner Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 5.749
Authors: Charles H Bombardier; Jesse R Fann; Catherine S Wilson; Allen W Heinemann; J Scott Richards; Ann Marie Warren; Larry Brooks; Catherine A Warms; Nancy R Temkin; Denise G Tate Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Bret R Rutherford; Timothy M Cooper; Amanda Persaud; Patrick J Brown; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 4.384