Literature DB >> 10403145

A Canadian multicenter, double-blind study of paroxetine and fluoxetine in major depressive disorder.

G Chouinard1, B Saxena, M C Bélanger, A Ravindran, D Bakish, L Beauclair, P Morris, N P Vasavan Nair, R Manchanda, R Reesal, R Remick, M C O'Neill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested clinical differences among selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. In a 12-week randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial, the antidepressant and anxiolytic efficacy of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors paroxetine and fluoxetine was compared in patients with moderate to severe depression.
METHODS: A total of 203 patients were randomized to fixed doses (20 mg/day) of paroxetine or fluoxetine for the first six weeks of therapy. From week 7-12, dosing could be adjusted biweekly, as required (paroxetine 20-50 mg/day, and fluoxetine 20-80 mg/day). The mean prescribed doses were paroxetine 25.5 mg/day (range 20.0-40.2 mg/day), and fluoxetine 27.5 mg/day (range 20.0-59.5 mg/day). Emergence of motor nervousness or restlessness was assessed using the ESRS scale for akathisia.
RESULTS: Both active treatments demonstrated comparable antidepressant efficacy (HAM-D, CGI). Anxiolytic activity of the two drugs (COVI, STAI, HAM-D) was also comparable. However, paroxetine was found to be superior to fluoxetine on two subscore measures at week 1 of therapy (HAM-D Agitation item, p < 0.05; Psychic Anxiety item, p < 0.05), with no differences detected after week 2. The overall incidence of adverse effects was comparable in the two treatment groups. Constipation, dyspepsia, tremor, sweating and abnormal ejaculation were more common in paroxetine-treated subjects, whereas nausea and nervousness were more frequent in fluoxetine-treated patients. Weight loss was more common in the fluoxetine versus paroxetine group (11.88% versus 2.94%, respectively). ESRS scores for akathisia were low throughout the study and showed little change. LIMITATIONS: Differences observed between the two drugs in antianxiety effects were limited to two measures of anxiety among several others. DISCUSSION: The data indicate that paroxetine and fluoxetine have comparable antidepressant and anxiolytic efficacy. Paroxetine appears to produce an earlier improvement in agitation and psychic anxiety symptoms compared with fluoxetine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10403145     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(98)00188-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  15 in total

1.  Goals in symptomatic pharmacologic management of frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  Tiffany W Chow; Mario F Mendez
Journal:  Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.035

2.  Does study design influence outcome?. The effects of placebo control and treatment duration in antidepressant trials.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 17.659

3.  Does differential drop-out explain the influence of study design on antidepressant response? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 4.  Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of New Generation Antidepressants.

Authors:  Ai Leng Khoo; Hui Jun Zhou; Monica Teng; Liang Lin; Ying Jiao Zhao; Lay Beng Soh; Yee Ming Mok; Boon Peng Lim; Kok Peng Gwee
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Sexual dysfunction associated with second-generation antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder: results from a systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ursula Reichenpfader; Gerald Gartlehner; Laura C Morgan; Amy Greenblatt; Barbara Nussbaumer; Richard A Hansen; Megan Van Noord; Linda Lux; Bradley N Gaynes
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Comparative efficacy and risk of harms of immediate- versus extended-release second-generation antidepressants: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Nussbaumer; Laura C Morgan; Ursula Reichenpfader; Amy Greenblatt; Richard A Hansen; Megan Van Noord; Linda Lux; Bradley N Gaynes; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 7.  Spotlight on paroxetine in psychiatric disorders in adults.

Authors:  Antona J Wagstaff; Susan M Cheer; Anna J Matheson; Douglas Ormrod; Karen L Goa
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  A systematic review of the correlates and management of nonpremature ejaculatory dysfunction in heterosexual men.

Authors:  Raouf Seyam
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2013-10

Review 9.  Comparative risk for harms of second-generation antidepressants : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gerald Gartlehner; Patricia Thieda; Richard A Hansen; Bradley N Gaynes; Angela Deveaugh-Geiss; Erin E Krebs; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Emerging treatments for premature ejaculation: focus on dapoxetine.

Authors:  Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.