Literature DB >> 19321524

Incidence of re-operation and subjective outcome following in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel.

C A Goldfarb1, M M Sutter, E J Martens, P R Manske.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the failure rate of in situ decompression for cubital tunnel syndrome as determined by the need for additional surgery. We performed a comprehensive chart review of 56 adult patients who had undergone in situ decompression for cubital tunnel syndrome in 69 extremities with more than 1 year follow-up. The patients completed a comprehensive questionnaire concerning preoperative and postoperative pain, numbness, and weakness. After decompression, symptoms were improved substantially or resolved. Five limbs (7%) with persistent symptoms postoperatively were treated successfully with anterior submuscular transposition. These data suggest that in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve is a reliable treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome and has a low failure rate. The uncommon patient with continued symptoms after decompression can be treated effectively with transposition of the ulnar nerve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19321524      PMCID: PMC3466810          DOI: 10.1177/1753193408101467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol        ISSN: 0266-7681


  19 in total

Review 1.  Review of treatment results for ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow.

Authors:  A L Dellon
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Anterior transposition compared with simple decompression for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

Authors:  Michael Zlowodzki; Simon Chan; Mohit Bhandari; Loree Kalliainen; Warren Schubert
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheina A Macadam; Rajiv Gandhi; Michael Bezuhly; Kelly A Lefaivre
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  The effect of surgical dissection on regional blood flow to the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel.

Authors:  K Ogata; P R Manske; P A Lesker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The rationale for and efficacy of surgical intervention for electrodiagnostic-negative cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  M M Tomaino; P J Brach; D P Vansickle
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Provocative testing for cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  C B Novak; G W Lee; S E Mackinnon; L Lay
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Factors related to the outcome of surgically managed compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow level.

Authors:  R J Foster; S Edshage
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  The treatment of the cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  R S Adelaar; W C Foster; C McDowell
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Ulnar nerve decompression at the cubital tunnel.

Authors:  P R Manske; R Johnston; D L Pruitt; W B Strecker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: comparison of simple decompression and anterior transposition.

Authors:  R C Chan; K W Paine; G Varughese
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  12 in total

1.  Pain and Function Following Revision Cubital Tunnel Surgery.

Authors:  Kristen M Davidge; Gregory C Ebersole; Susan E Mackinnon
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-11-28

2.  Clarification of Eponymous Anatomical Terminology: Structures Named After Dr Geoffrey V. Osborne That Compress the Ulnar Nerve at the Elbow.

Authors:  Arvin R Wali; Brandon Gabel; Madhawi Mitwalli; R Shane Tubbs; Justin M Brown
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-05-01

3.  Clinical assessment of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: reliability of instability testing and the association of hypermobility with clinical symptoms.

Authors:  Ryan P Calfee; Paul R Manske; Richard H Gelberman; Marlo O Van Steyn; Jennifer Steffen; Charles A Goldfarb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Trends in the Surgical Treatment for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Survey of Members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.

Authors:  Ayesha Yahya; Andrew R Malarkey; Ryan L Eschbaugh; H Brent Bamberger
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-08-23

Review 5.  Ulnar neuropathy: evaluation and management.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Susan E Mackinnon
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

Review 6.  Bilateral position-related ulnar neuropathy at elbow in pediatric population and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mariana Balikova; Marta Neklanova; Igor Sulla; Martin Hönig; Jan Halek; Vladimir Mihal; Vladimir Balik
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Comparison of Surgical Encounter Direct Costs for Three Methods of Cubital Tunnel Decompression.

Authors:  Nikolas H Kazmers; Evangelia L Lazaris; Chelsea M Allen; Angela P Presson; Andrew R Tyser
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Long-term Reoperation Rate for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Subcutaneous Transposition Versus In Situ Decompression.

Authors:  Douglas T Hutchinson; Ryan Sullivan; Micah K Sinclair
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-09-13

9.  Ulnar nerve stability-based surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome via a small incision: a comparison with classic anterior nerve transposition.

Authors:  Ho-Jung Kang; Il-Hyun Koh; Yong-Min Chun; Won-Taek Oh; Kwang-Ho Chung; Yun-Rak Choi
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Factors Influencing Outcomes after Ulnar Nerve Stability-Based Surgery for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ho Jung Kang; Won Taek Oh; Il Hyun Koh; Sungmin Kim; Yun Rak Choi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.