Literature DB >> 11721254

The rationale for and efficacy of surgical intervention for electrodiagnostic-negative cubital tunnel syndrome.

M M Tomaino1, P J Brach, D P Vansickle.   

Abstract

Because conservative management of McGowan grade 1 cubital tunnel syndrome (symptoms only) may be successful in a high percentage of patients, normal electrodiagnostic studies and the absence of intrinsic muscle weakness or decreased sensation or both may be viewed as contraindications to operative intervention. Because the results of surgery are known to be inferior once objective motor weakness and abnormal 2-point sensory discrimination (McGowan grades 2 and 3) develop, however, we advocate surgical intervention for patients with symptoms only, even when electrodiagnostic studies are normal. We enrolled 16 patients (18 elbows) with McGowan I cubital syndrome who underwent in situ ulnar nerve release and medial epicondylectomy. Paresthesias resolved in all cases, and both elbow range of motion and grip strength returned to normal in 17 of 18 elbows. The elbow flexion test resolved in all cases, and a Tinel's sign was present at final review in 5 elbows (28%). One patient required another operation to address a neuroma of a posterior branch of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, but additional morbidity was not identified after objective review and patient self-assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11721254     DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.26327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  12 in total

1.  Muscle Atrophy at Presentation of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Demographics and Duration of Symptoms.

Authors:  Matthew L Drake; Dana T Hensley; Wei C Chen; Kenneth F Taylor
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-04-05

2.  Prospective cohort study of symptom resolution outside of the ulnar nerve distribution following cubital tunnel release.

Authors:  Peter C Chimenti; Allison W McIntyre; Sean M Childs; Warren C Hammert; John C Elfar
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-06

Review 3.  Minimal-incision in situ ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow.

Authors:  Joshua M Adkinson; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 1.907

4.  Simple decompression of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Yong-Jun Cho; Sung-Min Cho; Seung-Hoon Sheen; Jong-Hun Choi; Dong-Hwa Huh; Joon-Ho Song
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2007-11-20

5.  Incidence of re-operation and subjective outcome following in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel.

Authors:  C A Goldfarb; M M Sutter; E J Martens; P R Manske
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2009-03-25

6.  Cubital tunnel surgery in patients with cervical radiculopathy: double crush syndrome?

Authors:  Marcelo Galarza; Roberto Gazzeri; Giovanni Gazzeri; Mario Zuccarello; Jamal Taha
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 7.  Nonspecific arm pain.

Authors:  Ali Moradi; Mohammad H Ebrahimzadeh; David Ring
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2013-12-15

8.  Patient-reported outcome of surgical treatment of nerve entrapments in the proximal forearm.

Authors:  Birgitta Svernlöv; Göran Nylander; Lars Adolfsson
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-09-11

9.  Long-term Reoperation Rate for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Subcutaneous Transposition Versus In Situ Decompression.

Authors:  Douglas T Hutchinson; Ryan Sullivan; Micah K Sinclair
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-09-13

10.  Interpretation of Electrodiagnostic Studies: How to Apply It to the Practice of Orthopaedic Surgery.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Berdale S Colorado; Andrew J Landau; David M Brogan
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.