Literature DB >> 7806810

Provocative testing for cubital tunnel syndrome.

C B Novak1, G W Lee, S E Mackinnon, L Lay.   

Abstract

This prospective study evaluated the clinical usefulness of provocative testing in 32 subjects with electrodiagnostically proven cubital tunnel syndrome and 33 control subjects. Four provocative tests were included: Tinel's sign, elbow flexion, pressure provocation, and combined elbow flexion and pressure provocation. The mean age of the control group was 41 years and 46 years for the group with cubital tunnel syndrome. In the control group, provocative tests were rarely positive. In 44 extremities with cubital tunnel syndrome, 31 had a Tinel's sign, 33 had a positive elbow flexion test, 39 had symptoms with pressure only, and 41 had symptoms with a combination of pressure provocation and elbow flexion testing. The sensitivity of the Tinel sign was 0.70, and at 30 seconds, the sensitivities of the other provocative tests were: elbow flexion (0.32), pressure provocation (0.55), and pressure-flexion test (0.91). The most sensitive provocative test in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome was elbow flexion when combined with pressure on the ulnar nerve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7806810     DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90193-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  24 in total

1.  A 37-year-old man with numbness in the hand.

Authors:  Scott D Middleton; Raymond E Anakwe
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Clinical assessment of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: reliability of instability testing and the association of hypermobility with clinical symptoms.

Authors:  Ryan P Calfee; Paul R Manske; Richard H Gelberman; Marlo O Van Steyn; Jennifer Steffen; Charles A Goldfarb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Ulnar neuropathy: evaluation and management.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Susan E Mackinnon
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

Review 4.  Chronic occupational repetitive strain injury.

Authors:  B A O'Neil; M E Forsythe; W D Stanish
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Minimal-incision in situ ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow.

Authors:  Joshua M Adkinson; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 1.907

6.  Incidence of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow in repetitive work.

Authors:  Alexis Descatha; Annette Leclerc; Jean-François Chastang; Yves Roquelaure
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  Incidence of re-operation and subjective outcome following in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel.

Authors:  C A Goldfarb; M M Sutter; E J Martens; P R Manske
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2009-03-25

8.  Ulnar nerve morbidity as a long-term complication of pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture.

Authors:  J-J Sinikumpu; S Victorzon; E-L Lindholm; T Peljo; W Serlo
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-08-10

9.  Medical diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome ameliorated with thrust manipulation of the elbow and carpals.

Authors:  Gary Kearns; Sharon Wang
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-05

10.  Outcomes of rigid night splinting and activity modification in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Chirag M Shah; Ryan P Calfee; Richard H Gelberman; Charles A Goldfarb
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.230

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.