Literature DB >> 7229295

Factors related to the outcome of surgically managed compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow level.

R J Foster, S Edshage.   

Abstract

Forty-eight of 59 patients who had undergone initial and no secondary treatment of compressive ulnar neuropathy at the level of the elbow during the period of January, 1968, to December, 1977, were reviewed by personal follow-up examination. Cubital tunnel decompression and anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve gave equal results as to the relief of pain and dysesthesia. However, anterior subcutaneous transposition gave better total relief of paresthesias and better return of intrinsic muscle function than did cubital tunnel decompression. Submuscular transposition was not evaluated in this study. The presence of intraoperative intraneural fibrosis or preoperative intrinsic muscle weakness were factors associated with a poor result. Prolonged duration of symptoms and advanced age were relative factors associated with a poor outcome. The presence of preoperative pain, paresthesias, or a widened two-point discrimination had no association with the eventual outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7229295     DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(81)80173-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  19 in total

1.  Muscle Atrophy at Presentation of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Demographics and Duration of Symptoms.

Authors:  Matthew L Drake; Dana T Hensley; Wei C Chen; Kenneth F Taylor
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-04-05

2.  Entrapment neuropathy at the cubital tunnel: simple decompression is the method of choice.

Authors:  H H Steiner; M S von Haken; H G Steiner-Milz
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Anatomical basis for a technique of ulnar nerve transposition.

Authors:  P C Amadio
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  A clinical and electrophysiological investigation of anterior transposition for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

Authors:  R J Friedman; T P Cochran
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1987

5.  Surgical Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Trends and the Influence of Patient and Surgeon Characteristics.

Authors:  Joshua M Adkinson; Lin Zhong; Oluseyi Aliu; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 6.  Minimal-incision in situ ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow.

Authors:  Joshua M Adkinson; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 1.907

7.  Cubital tunnel release with two limited incisions: a cadaver study.

Authors:  M Alp; S M Akkin; L Yalçin; T Marur; M Babacan
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Posttraumatic ulnar neuropathy versus non-traumatic cubital tunnel syndrome: clinical features and response to surgery.

Authors:  C Barrios; C Ganoza; J de Pablos; J Cañadell
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Incidence of re-operation and subjective outcome following in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel.

Authors:  C A Goldfarb; M M Sutter; E J Martens; P R Manske
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2009-03-25

10.  Effects of tendon transfer to restore index finger abduction for severe cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Shingo Nobuta; Katsumi Sato; Kenji Kanazawa; Masahito Hatori; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.384

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.