Literature DB >> 2666496

Review of treatment results for ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow.

A L Dellon1.   

Abstract

A review of 50 published reports between 1898 and 1988, comprising more than 2000 patients treated for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow, demonstrated that little more than personal bias is available for guidance in selecting treatment. To provide uniform data, the degree of nerve compression of the patients from these articles was staged using a sensory plus motor classification based on contemporary concepts of the pathophysiology of chronic nerve compression. The results of these studies are reinterpreted in light of this staging system. This analysis suggests that for a minimal degree of compression, excellent results can be achieved in 50% of the patients by nonoperative techniques and in almost 100% of patients by any of five surgical techniques. For a moderate degree of compression, the anterior submuscular technique yields the most excellent results with the fewest recurrences. For a severe degree of compression, the anterior intramuscular transposition yielded the fewest excellent and the most recurrent results. This review suggests that an internal neurolysis, combined with an anterior submuscular transposition, may be the best approach when the ulnar nerve is severely compressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2666496     DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(89)90192-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  43 in total

1.  The effect of operative technique on ulnar nerve strain following surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Justin Mitchell; John C Dunn; Nicholas Kusnezov; Julia Bader; Derek F Ipsen; Christopher L Forthman; Aaron Dykstra
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-05-22

2.  Surgical options for ulnar nerve entrapment: an example of individualized decision analysis.

Authors:  Jaime Gasco
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-02-25

3.  Correlation between the lengths of the upper limb and cubital tunnel: potential use in patients with proximal ulnar nerve entrapment.

Authors:  R Shane Tubbs; Marios Loukas; Nihal Apaydin; Tiffany D Cossey; Bulent Yalçin; Mohammadali M Shoja; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Pain and Function Following Revision Cubital Tunnel Surgery.

Authors:  Kristen M Davidge; Gregory C Ebersole; Susan E Mackinnon
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-11-28

5.  Selection of operative procedures for cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Christine B Novak; Susan E Mackinnon
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2008-09-19

Review 6.  Complications of compressive neuropathy: prevention and management strategies.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Kevin C Chung; Jennifer F Waljee
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 1.907

7.  The cubital tunnel: a radiologic and histotopographic study.

Authors:  Veronica Macchi; Cesare Tiengo; Andrea Porzionato; Carla Stecco; Gloria Sarasin; Shane Tubbs; Nicola Maffulli; Raffaele De Caro
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 8.  Minimal-incision in situ ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow.

Authors:  Joshua M Adkinson; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 1.907

9.  An outcome study for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a multicenter study by the surgery for ulnar nerve (SUN) study group.

Authors:  Jae W Song; Jennifer F Waljee; Patricia B Burns; Kevin C Chung; R Glenn Gaston; Steven C Haase; Warren C Hammert; Jeffrey N Lawton; Greg A Merrell; Paul F Nassab; Lynda J S Yang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Cubital tunnel release with two limited incisions: a cadaver study.

Authors:  M Alp; S M Akkin; L Yalçin; T Marur; M Babacan
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 1.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.