PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of using a free-breathing (FB) respiratory self-gated (RSG) approach for abdominal phase-contrast (PC) blood flow measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PC-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) flow measurements were performed within the right renal artery, common hepatic artery, and main portal vein during breath-hold (BH) and FB with both signal averaging and RSG in eight healthy volunteers. The resultant images were qualitatively scored by two independent reviewers blinded to acquisition techniques. Blood flow volume and cross-sectional vessel size measurements were compared for three techniques. RESULTS: The overall efficiency for the RSG-PC sequence was 38.9% +/- 4.7%. Images acquired with RSG effectively mitigated respiratory motion artifacts, which were clearly evident within FB signal-averaged images. RSG produced similar image quality to that of BH techniques (P > 0.146) and resulted in similar vessel size measurements (P = 0.694). Flow results for both FB RSG and signal-averaged reconstructions correlated well with BH flow measurements (r = 0.97 and 0.92, P < 0.001). However, only the RSG methods demonstrated excellent absolute agreement with BH-PC flow measurements (P = 0.600), with signal-averaged methods resulting in significant overestimations. CONCLUSION: RSG methods can limit respiratory motion artifacts to reduce flow measurement inaccuracies during free-breathing PC measurements in the abdomen.
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of using a free-breathing (FB) respiratory self-gated (RSG) approach for abdominal phase-contrast (PC) blood flow measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PC-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) flow measurements were performed within the right renal artery, common hepatic artery, and main portal vein during breath-hold (BH) and FB with both signal averaging and RSG in eight healthy volunteers. The resultant images were qualitatively scored by two independent reviewers blinded to acquisition techniques. Blood flow volume and cross-sectional vessel size measurements were compared for three techniques. RESULTS: The overall efficiency for the RSG-PC sequence was 38.9% +/- 4.7%. Images acquired with RSG effectively mitigated respiratory motion artifacts, which were clearly evident within FB signal-averaged images. RSG produced similar image quality to that of BH techniques (P > 0.146) and resulted in similar vessel size measurements (P = 0.694). Flow results for both FB RSG and signal-averaged reconstructions correlated well with BH flow measurements (r = 0.97 and 0.92, P < 0.001). However, only the RSG methods demonstrated excellent absolute agreement with BH-PC flow measurements (P = 0.600), with signal-averaged methods resulting in significant overestimations. CONCLUSION:RSG methods can limit respiratory motion artifacts to reduce flow measurement inaccuracies during free-breathing PC measurements in the abdomen.
Authors: Andrew C Larson; Richard D White; Gerhard Laub; Elliot R McVeigh; Debiao Li; Orlando P Simonetti Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: R I Pettigrew; W Dannels; J R Galloway; T Pearson; W Millikan; J M Henderson; J Peterson; M E Bernardino Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1987-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Michael Markl; Frandics P Chan; Marcus T Alley; Kris L Wedding; Mary T Draney; Chris J Elkins; David W Parker; Ryan Wicker; Charles A Taylor; Robert J Herfkens; Norbert J Pelc Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Weiguo Li; Zhuoli Zhang; Kangan Li; Ning Jin; Yue Zhang; Tianjing Zhang; Frank H Miller; Andrew C Larson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Manil D Chouhan; Rajeshwar P Mookerjee; Alan Bainbridge; Simon Walker-Samuel; Nathan Davies; Steve Halligan; Mark F Lythgoe; Stuart A Taylor Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Giulia Villa; Steffen Ringgaard; Ingo Hermann; Rebecca Noble; Paolo Brambilla; Dinah S Khatir; Frank G Zöllner; Susan T Francis; Nicholas M Selby; Andrea Remuzzi; Anna Caroli Journal: MAGMA Date: 2019-08-17 Impact factor: 2.310