Literature DB >> 19305327

Interest in intrauterine contraception among seekers of emergency contraception and pregnancy testing.

Eleanor Bimla Schwarz1, Megan Kavanaugh, Erika Douglas, Tamara Dubowitz, Mitchell D Creinin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the interest in using intrauterine contraception among women and adolescent girls seeking emergency contraception or walk-in pregnancy testing.
METHODS: We surveyed 412 women and adolescent girls who requested emergency contraception or pregnancy testing at four family planning clinics in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The 41-item survey assessed knowledge of, attitudes toward, and interest in using an intrauterine device (IUD). Data were analyzed using chi2 and Fisher exact tests and multivariable logistic regression methods.
RESULTS: The response rate was 85%. Twelve percent (95% confidence interval [CI] 9-15) of women and adolescent girls surveyed expressed interest in same-day insertion of an IUD, and 22% (95% CI 18-26) wanted more information about IUDs. Interest in same-day IUD insertion increased with higher education level, prior unwanted pregnancy, and experience with barriers to use of contraception.
CONCLUSION: Same-day IUD insertion may be a reasonable way to increase the use of highly-effective contraception among women and adolescent girls seeking emergency contraception or walk-in pregnancy testing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19305327      PMCID: PMC2739579          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819c856c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  18 in total

1.  An assessment of the quality of information available on the internet about the IUD and the potential impact on contraceptive choices.

Authors:  Eve Weiss; Kirsten Moore
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 2.  Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception.

Authors:  Catherine d'Arcangues
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Mia R S Zolna; Stanley K Henshaw; Lawrence B Finer
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2008-03

4.  Young women requesting emergency contraception are, despite contraceptive counseling, a high risk group for new unintended pregnancies.

Authors:  G Falk; L Falk; U Hanson; I Milsom
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Impact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortion.

Authors:  Suzan Goodman; Sarah K Hendlish; Matthew F Reeves; Anne Foster-Rosales
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Increasing intrauterine contraception use by reducing barriers to post-abortal and interval insertion.

Authors:  Suzan Goodman; Sarah K Hendlish; Courtney Benedict; Matthew F Reeves; Madeline Pera-Floyd; Anne Foster-Rosales
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Adolescent and young adult women's knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device.

Authors:  Amy K Whitaker; Lisa M Johnson; Bryna Harwood; Laurel Chiappetta; Mitchell D Creinin; Melanie A Gold
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Cost savings from the provision of specific methods of contraception in a publicly funded program.

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster; Daria P Rostovtseva; Claire D Brindis; M Antonia Biggs; Denis Hulett; Philip D Darney
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Reproductive care and rates of pregnancy in teenagers with negative pregnancy test results.

Authors:  Lois S Sadler; Jennifer Y Chen; Alison Moriarty Daley; John M Leventhal; Heather Reynolds
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.012

10.  Is the faculty of family planning and reproductive health care guidance on emergency contraception being followed in general practice? An audit in the West Midlands, UK.

Authors:  Lisa Bannister; Joanna Macve; Benjamin Pinkey; Helen Webberley
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2007-07
View more
  14 in total

1.  Copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception: clinical practice among contraceptive providers.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; J Joseph Speidel; Eleanor A Drey; James Trussell; Maya Blum; Philip D Darney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Emergency contraception with a copper IUD or oral levonorgestrel: an observational study of 1-year pregnancy rates.

Authors:  David K Turok; Janet C Jacobson; Amna I Dermish; Sara E Simonsen; Shawn Gurtcheff; Molly McFadden; Patricia A Murphy
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  A qualitative exploration of emergency contraception users' willingness to select the copper IUD.

Authors:  Rachel L Wright; Caren J Frost; David K Turok
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  U.S. Men's Perceptions and Experiences of Emergency Contraceptives.

Authors:  Rachel L Wright; Peter R Fawson; Caren J Frost; David K Turok
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2015-07-17

5.  One-year continuation of copper or levonorgestrel intrauterine devices initiated at the time of emergency contraception.

Authors:  J N Sanders; D K Turok; P A Royer; I S Thompson; L M Gawron; K E Storck
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  The intrauterine device as emergency contraception: how much do young women know?

Authors:  Suzan R Goodman; Alison M El Ayadi; Corinne H Rocca; Julia E Kohn; Courtney E Benedict; Jessica R Dieseldorff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Research priorities for preventing unintended pregnancy: moving beyond emergency contraceptive pills.

Authors:  James Trussell; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Katherine Guthrie
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2010-03

8.  A checklist approach to caring for women seeking pregnancy testing: effects on contraceptive knowledge and use.

Authors:  Jessica Lee; Melissa Papic; Erin Baldauf; Glenn Updike; E Bimla Schwarz
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Preference for and efficacy of oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception with concomitant placement of a levonorgestrel IUD: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  David K Turok; Jessica N Sanders; Ivana S Thompson; Pamela A Royer; Jennifer Eggebroten; Lori M Gawron
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 10.  The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience.

Authors:  Kelly Cleland; Haoping Zhu; Norman Goldstuck; Linan Cheng; James Trussell
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.