Literature DB >> 22067808

A qualitative exploration of emergency contraception users' willingness to select the copper IUD.

Rachel L Wright1, Caren J Frost, David K Turok.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The copper T intrauterine device (IUD) is an effective but underutilized method of emergency contraception (EC). This study investigates the factors influencing a woman's decision around which method of EC to select. STUDY
DESIGN: In-depth interviews with 14 IUD and 14 oral EC users aged 18-30 years accessing public health clinics.
RESULTS: Emergency contraception users associated long-term methods of contraception with long-term sexual relationships. Women were not aware of the possibility of using the copper IUD for EC. Cost was identified as a major barrier to accessing IUDs. Perceived side effects and impact on future pregnancies further influenced the EC method a participant selected.
CONCLUSIONS: Women think about contraception in the context of each separate relationship and not as a long-term individual plan. Most women were unaware of the copper IUD for EC. Furthermore, there is little discussion between women and their health-care providers around EC.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22067808      PMCID: PMC4082240          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  12 in total

1.  Measuring contraceptive use patterns among teenage and adult women.

Authors:  D A Glei
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

2.  Pregnancy intention and pregnancy happiness: are they different?

Authors:  M R Sable; M K Libbus
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-09

3.  Exploring the concepts of intended, planned, and wanted pregnancy.

Authors:  R C Fischer; J B Stanford; P Jameson; M J DeWitt
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  None of them were satisfactory: women's experiences with contraception.

Authors:  Annie Mills; Lesley Barclay
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2006-05

5.  Riskier than we thought: revised estimates of noncontracepting women risking unintended pregnancy.

Authors:  Laura Gaydos; Carol J Rowland Hogue; Michael R Kramer
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Health care providers' knowledge about contraceptive evidence: a barrier to quality family planning care?

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Kira Levy; Rachel Ruskin; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Anjani Chandra; Gladys M Martinez; William D Mosher; Joyce C Abma; Jo Jones
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2005-12

8.  Effect of a brief educational intervention on the attitudes of young women toward the intrauterine device.

Authors:  Amy K Whitaker; Mishka Terplan; Melanie A Gold; Lisa M Johnson; Mitchell D Creinin; Bryna Harwood
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 1.814

9.  Reasons for ineffective pre-pregnancy contraception use in patients seeking abortion services.

Authors:  Juell B Homco; Jeffrey F Peipert; Gina M Secura; Vanessa A Lewis; Jenifer E Allsworth
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Interest in intrauterine contraception among seekers of emergency contraception and pregnancy testing.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Megan Kavanaugh; Erika Douglas; Tamara Dubowitz; Mitchell D Creinin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  7 in total

1.  U.S. Men's Perceptions and Experiences of Emergency Contraceptives.

Authors:  Rachel L Wright; Peter R Fawson; Caren J Frost; David K Turok
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2015-07-17

2.  Choice of Emergency Contraceptive and Decision Making Regarding Subsequent Unintended Pregnancy.

Authors:  Pamela A Royer; David K Turok; Jessica N Sanders; Hanna M Saltzman
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience.

Authors:  Kelly Cleland; Haoping Zhu; Norman Goldstuck; Linan Cheng; James Trussell
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  Emerging options for emergency contraception.

Authors:  Atsuko Koyama; Laura Hagopian; Judith Linden
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Reprod Health       Date:  2013-02-18

Review 5.  Emergency contraception - potential for women's health.

Authors:  Suneeta Mittal
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Exploring young women's reasons for adopting intrauterine or oral emergency contraception in the United States: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shelly Kaller; Aisha Mays; Lori Freedman; Cynthia C Harper; M Antonia Biggs
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 7.  Microbicides for the Treatment of Sexually Transmitted HIV Infections.

Authors:  Onkar Singh; Tarun Garg; Goutam Rath; Amit K Goyal
Journal:  J Pharm (Cairo)       Date:  2014-02-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.