Literature DB >> 18318867

Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005.

Rachel K Jones1, Mia R S Zolna, Stanley K Henshaw, Lawrence B Finer.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Accurate information about abortion incidence and services is necessary to monitor levels of unwanted pregnancy and women's ability to access abortion services.
METHODS: All known abortion providers in the United States were contacted for information about abortion services in 2004 and 2005. This information, along with data from the U.S. Census Bureau, was used to examine national and state trends in numbers of abortions and abortion rates, proportions of counties and metropolitan areas without an abortion provider, and accessibility of abortion services.
RESULTS: An estimated 1.2 million abortions were performed in the United States in 2005, 8% fewer than in 2000. The abortion rate in 2005 was 19.4 per 1,000 women aged 15-44; this rate represents a 9% decline from 2000. There were 1,787 abortion providers in 2005, only 2% fewer than in 2000. Some 87% of U.S. counties, containing 35% of women aged 15-44, did not have an abortion provider in 2005. Early medication abortion, offered by an estimated 57% of known providers, accounted for 13% of abortions (and for 22% of abortions before nine weeks' gestation). The average amount paid for an abortion at 10 weeks was $413-after adjustment for inflation, $11 less than in 2001.
CONCLUSION: The numbers of abortions and the abortion rate continued their long-term decline through 2005. Reasons for this trend are unknown but may include improved access to and use of contraceptives or decreased access to abortion services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18318867     DOI: 10.1363/4000608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health        ISSN: 1538-6341


  53 in total

1.  Comparison of contraceptive method chosen by women with and without a recent history of induced abortion.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 2.  Update in women's health for the general internist.

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; Megan McNamara; Redonda G Miller; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Trends in use of medical abortion in the United States: reanalysis of surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001-2008.

Authors:  Karen Pazol; Andreea A Creanga; Suzanne B Zane
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Incidence of induced abortions in Peru.

Authors:  Renzo Puccetti
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Paradigm shift: moving toward access in every office.

Authors:  Margaret E Johnson Baylson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Medical liability insurance as a barrier to the provision of abortion services in family medicine.

Authors:  Christine E Dehlendorf; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Unintended consequences: abortion training in the years after Roe v Wade.

Authors:  Sarp Aksel; Lydia Fein; Em Ketterer; Emily Young; Lois Backus
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Continuation of the etonogestrel implant in women undergoing immediate postabortion placement.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; David L Eisenberg; Qiuhong Zhao; Christina Buckel; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Providing contraception for women taking potentially teratogenic medications: a survey of internal medicine physicians' knowledge, attitudes and barriers.

Authors:  David L Eisenberg; Catherine Stika; Ami Desai; David Baker; Kathleen J Yost
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Extending contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act saves public funds.

Authors:  Suzanne Burlone; Alison B Edelman; Aaron B Caughey; James Trussell; Stella Dantas; Maria I Rodriguez
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.