Literature DB >> 19296324

Lumbar spine forces during manoeuvring of ceiling-based and floor-based patient transfer devices.

W S Marras1, G G Knapik, S Ferguson.   

Abstract

Patient handling continues to represent a high risk task for low back pain (LBP) among health caregivers. Previous studies indicated that manual transfers of patients impose unacceptable loads on the spine even when two caregivers perform the transfer. Patient lift devices are considered a potential intervention; however, few biomechanical analyses have investigated the spine loads and LBP risk associated with these transfer devices. This study analysed the 3-D spine forces imposed upon the lumbar spine when 10 subjects manipulated ceiling-based and floor-based patient lifts through various patient handling conditions and manoeuvres. The results indicated that ceiling-mounted patient lift systems imposed spine forces upon the lumbar spine that would be considered safe, whereas floor-based patient handling systems had the potential to increase anterior/posterior shear forces to unacceptable levels during patient handling manoeuvres. Given these findings, ceiling-based lifts are preferable to floor-based patient transfer systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19296324     DOI: 10.1080/00140130802376075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  14 in total

1.  A new approach to assess movements and isometric postures of spine and trunk at the workplace.

Authors:  Max Wunderlich; Thomas Rüther; Dieter Essfeld; Thomas C Erren; Claus Piekarski; Dieter Leyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Characteristic values of the lumbar load of manual patient handling for the application in workers' compensation procedures.

Authors:  Claus Jordan; Alwin Luttmann; Andreas Theilmeier; Stefan Kuhn; Norbert Wortmann; Matthias Jäger
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.646

3.  Measurement of the number of lumbar spinal movements in the sagittal plane in a 24-hour period.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Tobias Consmüller; Marcel Dreischarf; Maxim Bashkuev; Alexander Disch; Esther Pries; Georg N Duda; Hendrik Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Improving transfer task practices used with air travelers with mobility impairments: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Rose M Fadul; Lisa M Brown; Gail Powell-Cope
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.222

5.  Work-related activities associated with injury in occupational and physical therapists.

Authors:  Amy R Darragh; Marc Campo; Phyllis King
Journal:  Work       Date:  2012

6.  Mechanically induced histochemical and structural damage in the annulus fibrosus and cartilaginous endplate: a multi-colour immunofluorescence analysis.

Authors:  Jackie D Zehr; Fasih Ahmad Rahman; Jack P Callaghan; Joe Quadrilatero
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.051

7.  Further Development of a Robotic-Assisted Transfer Device.

Authors:  Jessica Burkman; Garrett Grindle; Hongwu Wang; Annmarie Kelleher; Rory A Cooper
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2017

8.  Psychophysical basis for maximum pushing and pulling forces: A review and recommendations.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Thomas Waters; Jay Kapellusch; Waldemar Karwowski
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.656

9.  Ergonomic Assessment of Floor-based and Overhead Lifts.

Authors:  Thomas R Waters; Robert Dick; Brian Lowe; Dwight Werren; Kelley Parsons
Journal:  Am J Safe Patient Handl Mov       Date:  2012-12

10.  Activities of everyday life with high spinal loads.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; David Pohl; Alwina Bender; Friedmar Graichen; Jörn Dymke; Hendrik Schmidt; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.